[apps-discuss] Title of docs in apps-review comments

"Manger, James H" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com> Wed, 29 September 2010 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5773A6BF1 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.443
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.443 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.457, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AU=0.377, HOST_EQ_AU=0.327, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RELAY_IS_203=0.994]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fO0Dqh3q7fgB for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ipxavo.tcif.telstra.com.au (ipxavo.tcif.telstra.com.au [203.35.135.200]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6CA3A6BE1 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:23:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.57,250,1283695200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="12634469"
Received: from unknown (HELO ipcdvi.tcif.telstra.com.au) ([10.97.217.212]) by ipoavi.tcif.telstra.com.au with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2010 10:23:42 +1000
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6120"; a="9546840"
Received: from wsmsg3707.srv.dir.telstra.com ([172.49.40.81]) by ipcdvi.tcif.telstra.com.au with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2010 10:23:42 +1000
Received: from WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com ([172.49.40.159]) by wsmsg3707.srv.dir.telstra.com ([172.49.40.81]) with mapi; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:23:41 +1000
From: "Manger, James H" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:23:39 +1000
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] Title of docs in apps-review comments
Thread-Index: ActfR78A919if47BTaiNVGH8hZ1m3QAHcGyg
Message-ID: <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E1126C4376B8@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343D460DB7CB@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343D460DB7CB@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-AU
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E1126C4376B8WSMSG3153Vsrv_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [apps-discuss] Title of docs in apps-review comments
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:23:04 -0000

The app-reviews appearing on this list look like a useful step in the IETF process.

Could the *title* of the draft being reviewed please be included in the review emails (ie added to the template http://www.apps.ietf.org/content/apps-review-template). The reviews currently only list the file name of the draft, which doesn't give enough context given the broad range of topics in the Apps area.



Instead of just:

  Document: draft-arkko-townsley-coexistence-04



Include:

  Document: draft-arkko-townsley-coexistence-04

  Title: IPv4 Run-Out and IPv4-IPv6 Co-Existence Scenarios



Thanks



--

James Manger