Re: [apps-discuss] BCP 166, RFC 6365 on Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Thu, 08 September 2011 01:06 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39E621F8D21 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 18:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.582
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JObNYbMiMnyx for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 18:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DD921F8D1D for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 18:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1R1T5t-000D6G-SR; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:07:54 -0400
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:07:53 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <7EFE851DFE8E017623F50FCF@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVCPkf4_JMEwVOjs2nsvkUg7ytnWRyvWo1F=8Qjz0jsY+A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110907214310.19FE198C284@rfc-editor.org> <CAC4RtVCPkf4_JMEwVOjs2nsvkUg7ytnWRyvWo1F=8Qjz0jsY+A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] BCP 166, RFC 6365 on Terminology Used in Internationalization in the IETF
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 01:06:04 -0000
--On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 19:44 -0400 Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: >> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC >> libraries. >> >> BCP 166 >> RFC 6365 >> >> Title: Terminology Used in >> Internationalization in the IETF >> Author: P. Hoffman, J. Klensin >> Status: Best Current Practice > > This is appsawg's first RFC (5892bis is still in the RFC > Editor queue). Boo-YA! I'm happy to help with that distinction and am sure Paul is too although a lot of the credit goes to the RFC Editor, particularly Alice Hagens, for doing an outstanding job and doing it very quickly. 5892bis has been stuck in IANA hold (i.e., not either the WG's or the RFC Editor's fault)... I believe there has been another, independent, effort lately to un-stick it, but that may deserve a nudge from the IETF side too. john
- Re: [apps-discuss] BCP 166, RFC 6365 on Terminolo… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] BCP 166, RFC 6365 on Terminolo… John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-discuss] BCP 166, RFC 6365 on Terminolo… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] BCP 166, RFC 6365 on Terminolo… Frank Ellermann
- [apps-discuss] Status of 5892bis and IANA (was: R… John C Klensin
- [apps-discuss] BCP 166, RFC 6365 on Terminology U… rfc-editor