Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on multipart/form-data
Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Thu, 19 September 2013 13:29 UTC
Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D0321F9477 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 06:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TjrjWjXKCaTw for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 06:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2C721F9473 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 06:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id z12so7999710wgg.10 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 06:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=to:message-id:from:cc:date:mime-version:subject:content-type; bh=Z0FLylfn0rL/Xds2RFbdTVW75A2wgQwTp2pF/pgEA8E=; b=YtSMSeV0goxrCsp+rVjZYqOn+bJIKLfzzDWdzn+4vNfJWE9/Rk4OkOm6WVu51DyiEe CJ9Q1aPUFSew7P58b7tdAQmarOjKgbB1A2XeSOoKdoWGH9T2PcYPlFsHkmfs/yWrMmUo nSB/S1Ahk4Lh4c6sjk/jKUxXJC0GI9An41eQk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:message-id:from:cc:date:mime-version:subject :content-type; bh=Z0FLylfn0rL/Xds2RFbdTVW75A2wgQwTp2pF/pgEA8E=; b=UIz+vmUVn35EdItfQPtDjE8XitKrYIwNfS16Sc7cDjqBpM+svOysEWZsGvf1ygn2XS K1nllzTf6GzXOceVnMbzYAPzQmXEc3h0P8r/dRNb0oqqp531XHx9aUQWcm1zfP442Lur qb8HesvdEvMtt1GYp2XZOqiMA4j6l1QCW8vrai+lyQ6z9h75Qe7ffq5ouJgQfCeksLsY 2Go44IguhRQU8PRUc51OiAZFRA6QYJzJNCMDQw+fWLcSehnfVt+U19+TA67e/H+ZV78M kKbZemIA9VuQgtLgIDyJW9mMr77izrHjacdixbigAUvJiooBUJrmxBsxar4g/eQSZi7r 0zvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlKzqYM+pogHuYFwq750bbhPnFgj+cnX1AGz50HEPd0IlGMNd4DTU2wwNsq5N0+80EN5091
X-Received: by 10.194.239.74 with SMTP id vq10mr333534wjc.70.1379597375510; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 06:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Mac-mini.local (peirce.dave.cridland.net. [217.155.137.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id mw9sm17646172wib.0.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Sep 2013 06:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-Id: <phSQWY29ag6ikEXv2E8eiO2imAHxaDkdDsncQPWozmvQ0rSYY@smtp.gmail.com>
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 13:29:33 -0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Inky (TM) v2.0.523A.D3E0 ("Ink Different")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on multipart/form-data
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 13:29:37 -0000
Julian Reschke wrote: >> >> I know of RFC 2047 and RFC 2231, as well as unencoded UTF-8 and >> unencoded ISO-8859-1 (I think). > > No surprise here Yes, but one wonders if the unencoded UTF-8 actually does any harm at all in a 8bit/binary-safe protocol like HTTP. If most processors accept this - and I have no idea - it might even be useful to document. Dave. Sent with [inky: <http://inky.com?kme=signature>]
- [apps-discuss] Feedback on multipart/form-data Larry Masinter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on multipart/form-data Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on multipart/form-data Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on multipart/form-data Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on multipart/form-data Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on multipart/form-data Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on multipart/form-data Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on multipart/form-data Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on multipart/form-data Julian Reschke
- Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on multipart/form-data Daniel Stenberg