[apps-discuss] Fwd: Informal Last Call for draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04, was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04.txt

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sun, 29 January 2012 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6485F21F8581 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 07:39:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.550, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h0xhxZJ7p6DX for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 07:39:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DE37E21F8546 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 07:39:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2012 15:39:49 -0000
Received: from p3EE276D7.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [62.226.118.215] by mail.gmx.net (mp069) with SMTP; 29 Jan 2012 16:39:49 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+6XgIxqIy6fionB4feiUpmu7P33xkcUCERSU+zV4 EvuoDyWAJQtVBg
Message-ID: <4F256840.4070403@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:39:44 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
References: <4F2567DA.3060608@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4F2567DA.3060608@gmx.de>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <4F2567DA.3060608@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 08:04:41 -0800
Subject: [apps-discuss] Fwd: Informal Last Call for draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04, was: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:39:52 -0000

(FYI)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Informal Last Call for draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04, was: 
Fwd: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04.txt
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:38:02 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Hi there,

I just submitted a new revision of d draft-reschke-basicauth-enc - see
below (HTML version at
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04.html>;
this version also includes new hooks for providing feedback; please try!).

At this point, I'd like to solicit additional feedback before I proceed;
in particular: should this potentially be an Applications Area WG
deliverable?

With respect to intended status: in theory, this is a candidate for
Experimental. However, Basic Authentication (as defined in RFC 2617)
doesn't have a registry for extension parameters, so the cleanest
approach appears to say "Updates 2617", which IMHO requires a standards
track document.

Best regards, Julian


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: I-D Action: draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04.txt
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 07:28:40 -0800
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.

	Title           : An Encoding Parameter for HTTP Basic Authentication
	Author(s)       : Julian F. Reschke
	Filename        : draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04.txt
	Pages           : 9
	Date            : 2012-01-29

    The "Basic" authentication scheme defined in RFC 2617 does not
    properly define how to treat non-ASCII characters.  This has lead to
    a situation where user agent implementations disagree, and servers
    make different assumptions based on the locales they are running in.
    There is little interoperability for characters in the ISO-8859-1
    character set, and even less interoperability for any characters
    beyond that.

    This document defines a backwards-compatible extension to "Basic",
    specifying the server's character encoding expectation, using a new
    authentication scheme parameter.


A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-reschke-basicauth-enc-04.txt

_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt