[apps-discuss] Fwd: VDI discussion mtg notes, pls review. thanks.
Bhumip Khasnabish <vumip1@gmail.com> Thu, 19 May 2011 03:20 UTC
Return-Path: <vumip1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAD8E06ED for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E4EZxFMXLKjs for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772B5E0696 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wwk4 with SMTP id 4so5226563wwk.1 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:20:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=cS5rNw3AlohjifOQKQrBsAPYH+/tS6F/FxtPAaK7P70=; b=KD5Q2azDBUWD48ZpHEe9A9tSoNdhxyaSD/y94wA/Ny6BUZE/sculfUcdVCEdy+B5A6 7Ub0KPurXOtTqjbaskjdwYU5teoMM5coe7jrh3KKsj8+D4RuRcnKvQB9eeqTY9lPb8+R +EfEa2cJ0UJNZiUmOfxVCHzxNAGPqaTqzIkRw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=J662sNIwYqZdGmIFZDcVptW7UQErp4DO2BNEMJQhA66hv7/MZ/BX+lVKXMnPupUC+L vyga2B5EiK+k63MComfYWJE10icjKi0MS8ewx9NsGTePoxMgVecZbjAHiyVHy4iPmKpB P3GUEbjH8WhSfAruH+KC8iM1U4dU1UwdIDA0M=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.237.155 with SMTP id y27mr5124327weq.82.1305775238276; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:20:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.52.75 with HTTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 20:20:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 23:20:38 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=YddaZ=RufOu8vKx5ivuoD5eF20A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bhumip Khasnabish <vumip1@gmail.com>
To: Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0015175dda023be60d04a3987d33"
Subject: [apps-discuss] Fwd: VDI discussion mtg notes, pls review. thanks.
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 03:20:41 -0000
Below pls find the notes from the last two VDI discussion conf calls. Thanks. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ *10 AM ET, Friday, 06 May, 2011.* Attendees: Viswas, YingZhe, Paul, Gene, Spencer, Tom, Liang, and Bhumip Bhumip opened the mtg. by mentioning that in future, we’ll use the apps-discuss@ietf.org, for discussing VDI works/drafts/progress, so everyone should register into this list (if interested in updates on VDI). Similarly, we plan to use opsawg@ietf.org for discussion and distribution of Datacenter Operations and Management (DCOPS) related drafts and works, so PLEASE register to opsawg@ietf.org by sending an email to opsawg-request@ietf.org if you have not done so already. Gene mentioned that he is looking for inputs related to VDI to update the CloudLog draft (http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-cloud-log-01.txt) and that his new email address is golov@swbell.net (or ggolovinsky@gmail.com). Paul wants to see a real need (use cases) for API/interop between opensoure VDC and other options in mixed vendors environment via comments from the attendees and participants of the mtgs. Tom may contribute on use cases and testability (related to interoperability) for VDI. Spencer was requested to bring in use cases and the requirements of interoperability for various scenarios. Bhumip suggested that API/interop may be required for (a) seamless session transfer, (b) support of private and business (Enterprise) profiles in the same device, (c) Effortless customization of services, and (d) Seamless add/move/upgrade/change management of VDC and services. Liang reviewed a multi-layer (Applications, Virtual channel, Session control, Transport) model for VDI protocol stack, and plan to work on a draft describing the details. Bhumip polled all of the announced attendees for closing comments and suggestions. Hearing none, the mtg was adjourned with a wish for everyone to have a great weekend. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ *10 AM ET, Friday, 22 April, 2011. * Attendees: Ning, Suren, Mr. Shima, Carl, Marco, Liang, Joe Lin, and Bhumip Bhumip opened the mtg. by mentioning that in future, we’ll use the apps-discuss@ietf.org, for discussing VDI works/drafts/progress, so everyone should register into this list (if interested in updates on VDI). Similarly, we plan to use opsawg@ietf.org for discussion and distribution of Datacenter Operations and Management (DCOPS) related drafts and works, so PLEASE register to opsawg@ietf.org by sending an email to opsawg-request@ietf.org if you have not done so already. Ning discussed that VDI may be useful for shared applications over a common system, and that the current focus of VDI may be only consumer oriented services. Marco suggested VDI use cases currently exist for Enterprise, Residential (consumer) and machine-to-machine services. We need to develop drafts summarizing these use cases. Bhumip described that we need to work on architecture and functional requirements for VDI first and these can be used for developing network and protocol requirements, and API development. Laing suggested that we need to scope the VDI works first and then develop basic and enhanced requirements. Liang will present his thoughts on how these can be achieved during the next conf call. Suren mentioned that he is creating VDI security requirements draft based on the cloud security framework (CSF) that he has been working on since last year. He plans to review that draft in a future conf call. Bhumip polled all of the announced attendees for closing comments and suggestions. Hearing none, the mtg was adjourned with a wish for everyone to have a great weekend. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- [apps-discuss] Fwd: VDI discussion mtg notes, pls… Bhumip Khasnabish