[apps-review] The importance of Apps Review team reviews
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Fri, 28 January 2011 21:57 UTC
Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85D23A68C8 for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:57:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.151, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pyiELmqgaAyg for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:57:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3548E3A67EC for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:57:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] ((unknown) [109.73.6.25]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <TUM8fgADL6xj@rufus.isode.com>; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:00:32 +0000
X-SMTP-Protocol-Errors: NORDNS
Message-ID: <4D433C5D.8040209@isode.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 00:59:57 +0300
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: apps-review@ietf.org
References: <AANLkTikaHw7GKiAn1B4Uu5sytyzmi97ExejzfDT82UzO@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110126212046.0c26cae8@resistor.net> <5869A181BE49612A2C0C7836@PST.JCK.COM> <6.2.5.6.2.20110127010602.0b515078@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110127010602.0b515078@elandnews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [apps-review] The importance of Apps Review team reviews
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 21:57:29 -0000
Hi, [Slowly replying to messages in this thread while on holidays.] SM wrote: > I think that the Apps Area Directors find the reviews useful or else > they would not have asked for it. Indeed, I can confirm that Peter and I read reviews and take them into consideration. Maybe we should explicitly acknowledge that we do, especially in situations when editors of documents also read reviews but don't reply to them. I can also say that as an AD, I am really grateful to these reviews, as I believe they improve quality of documents that Apps ADs need to sponsor or review. Thank you, Alexey -- IETF Application Area Director, <http://www.ietf.org/iesg/members.html> Internet Messaging Team Lead, <http://www.isode.com> JID: same as my email address
- Re: [apps-review] Feeling kind of confused about … SM
- Re: [apps-review] Feeling kind of confused about … SM
- Re: [apps-review] Feeling kind of confused about … Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-review] Feeling kind of confused about … John C Klensin
- [apps-review] The importance of Apps Review team … Alexey Melnikov