Re: [apps-review] request for review: draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-14

SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 17 November 2011 08:55 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA1521F9A99 for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:55:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.572
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2U46I-aMHoYe for <apps-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:55:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A119221F9A98 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:55:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sm-THINK.elandsys.com (dhcp-16fb.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.22.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAH8tGaP008319; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:55:21 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1321520122; bh=fyk7wro+eihdPfRqwQm3o6622eA=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=uI6RzGgee5V91tU8O03E/YiO+u8H89TBHH2fqjRLUwkgx13rGpejAXUhl4M4la7IH 8idgycXqq0xouwo2GhQcTvGWiqA5bvdXQghOSwn0LgtWFukDSql3by7QS9HO+bPV+V Nwn2DHL7/JjFoEpLa4FhNldvAlz7Tz+INzxS5Eao=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20111117005041.0b8e2068@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:54:31 -0800
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
From: SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EC4CA3C.9080406@stpeter.im>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20111117003602.08887720@elandnews.com> <4EC4CA3C.9080406@stpeter.im>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-review] request for review: draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-14
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:55:27 -0000

Hi Peter,
At 12:47 AM 11/17/2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>SM, what is Mark's other pending review? I ask because we really want
>good HTTP knowledge brought to bear on this OAuth spec, so we might want
>to ask someone else to look at the other pending review.

The pending review is for draft-ietf-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-05.  I can 
reassign that draft to someone else if Mark can only do one of the 
assignments.  I am waiting for feedback from Mark in case he has 
already acted on the pending review.

Best regards,
-sm