Re: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary-03 and draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-sync-08

[Joshua Bell <[e-mail]>]

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Richard L. Barnes <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Joshua: Thanks for your review.  Does the latest version address your
> concerns?
>

Yes; Karl has done several iterations based on feedback, and the result
looks good to me.

(That said, I feel that my involvement in getting the RELAX-NG schema and
examples in -lost-serviceboundary to validate has "tainted" me as a
reviewer, and I would suggest getting another XML-savvy member of
apps-review to do a next pass, if one is desired.)


> Marc: Have you had a chance to look at -lost-sync?
>
> Thanks,
> --Richard
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 26, 2010, at 2:46 PM, SM wrote:
>
>  Hi Joshua, Marc,
>>
>> Richard Barnes requested a review of two ECRIT documents,
>> draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary-03 and draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-sync.
>>  The initial request went to XML-DIR ( see
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit/current/msg07065.html and
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit/current/msg07066.html ).
>>
>> As you two are next in line for XML reviews, the
>> draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary-03 review is assigned to Joshua
>> Bell and the draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-sync-08 review (there is a -09 version)
>> is assigned to Marc Blanchet.
>>
>> You can find information about the authors in the datatracker (
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-servicelistboundary/and
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-sync/). Previous
>> reviews from the Apps-review Team are accessible at
>> http://www.apps.ietf.org/content/apps-review-template
>>
>> The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the authors, the ECRIT WG
>> Chairs and document shepherd, if applicable.  The subject of the email when
>> submitting the review should be "apps-team review of draft-name".
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -sm
>>
>>
>