[apps-review] Request for review: draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis
SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 01 February 2011 23:56 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C8A3A6C78 for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:56:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.513
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WaJ8n6KNULb7 for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:56:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DED83A6B26 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:56:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.239.186]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p11NxOa7025036; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:59:29 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1296604771; bh=y+RXgJWDYaVSBMH9Wz5Ve3EaDMM=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=y4+3oAWwzY3fDTc69qPsD18pwN0S3o8TJWnr64qXB4NS1NaUdfAFdH1IevbtiW2P9 p2xC/C5ASLElgtkPWEmt8527y+omXU2CNMpGCmI9JlTgsZwfpkca3zOeH/LPejdpq1 qM2mhLBr2y2iYqQXdlusS0zKNXICeFQubmVfJWcI=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20110201153522.0d42b260@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:39:32 -0800
To: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
From: SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: [apps-review] Request for review: draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 23:56:17 -0000
Hi Joshua, Peter requested a review of draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-07. The review has been assigned to you and is due by February 8, 2010. If you need more time, please contact me. You can find information about the author and WG in the datatracker ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis/ ). Some previous reviews from the Apps-review Team are accessible at http://www.apps.ietf.org/content/apps-review-template The review should be sent to apps-discuss, the author and the IESG. I suggest copying the ietf@ietf.org mailing list as well as the proposal requires wider discussion within the IETF. The subject of the email when submitting the review should be "apps-team review of draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-07". Best regards, -sm