Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews
SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sun, 20 March 2011 21:21 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C203A6BE3 for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.565
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.565 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.034, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7kTNLgYDzga4 for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2073A6BE2 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.233.187]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2KLN8r5007945; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:23:17 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1300656199; bh=dhLFKmd0+sabuGmhQeJZDHRbbJs=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=CmzPOKxNkWW2AVDHVJAkb+CZZT2wI474rHym4+DxwB2EsfKAqTQqpBgMhzyJvy9t4 WVJBSjt10rDUZPLu7OzuxHh3k7mEDZtmhnC+xIzAbmBnYprqY4wiYcEJqlF3uTYewb FMj4yqTaC0U6ShRZ9cwjkuOeHiKcYC/5HlVUzSWI=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20110320131107.0c1623e8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:22:31 -0700
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
From: SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D861916.30504@qualcomm.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20110318165117.0d43e6e0@elandnews.com> <4D850453.1090509@qualcomm.com> <4D853F38.4080203@dcrocker.net> <f5b8vwanlrr.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk> <4D861916.30504@qualcomm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 21:21:51 -0000
Hi Pete, At 08:11 20-03-2011, Pete Resnick wrote: >Even if you were assigned one per month, what would be the amount of >time you would want from "pickup out of the queue" until "completion >of review"? What I worry about is the same thing SM is trying to >address with the initial proposed changes: I don't want to wait for >a month to find out that someone is *not* going to be able to >complete a review and then we have to restart the month timer in the >queue, especially for what I'm hoping is an early cursory review. Is >one week enough time to complete a review of this sort, even if you >are only asked to do one per month? The general agreement was one week for reviews going for IESG evaluation and two weeks for other reviews. Here's when some reviews were assigned and when they were submitted: draft-cheshire-dnsext-dns-sd 2010-12-02 2010-12-03 draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control 2010-12-02 2010-12-15 draft-bryan-metalinkhttp 2011-01-22 2011-02-28 draft-ietf-hokey-ldn-discovery-06 2011-02-01 2011-02-04 draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06 2011-02-01 2011-02-07 draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-07 2011-02-01 2011-02-07 Some reviewers take a week or less. As some documents are be quite lengthy, the review takes more time. There are also other factors to take into account, such as how familiar the reviewer is with the subject matter, to determine how long a review may take. Although I mentioned it several times, team members do not generally ask to be put on leave. I didn't do that last November and it caused some delays in posting the assignments. It is easier for me to plan the work if I know about the availability of reviewers. I suggest that we do a few cursory reviews so that the team gets a better idea of how it works and how much work it entails. Best regards, -sm
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Eric Burger
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews (Was: Sug… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Eric Burger
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews (Was: Sug… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews (Was: Sug… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews (Was: Sug… Claudio Allocchio
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews (Was: Sug… Ted Hardie
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews (Was: Suggest… Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Claudio Allocchio
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Kurt Zeilenga
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Martin J. Dürst
- [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applications … SM