IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [appsdir] Initial review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 15 April 2015 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD65F1B2F16 for <appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GFzMKwSnFD1Q for <appsdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB1861B2F18 for <appsdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8589; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429119454; x=1430329054; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=gvG8dQYczfmKDAQ4bpG6SlYNYqbqIrv8y/BbQDElhN4=; b=VGUeyzpCy/N6tcuBYZGDRcXhOjsikpxkgGPhpMs30wFgi6WpKCuQ6t5r xQce+a+4UxxUMUvd5fNxUBHZQy9PIR2Fb0BkPH2LmOljxuTEgaVmEhKCB FjjfUHNms3vKAUo9WdfibqsKecxyTO82gwEri8yGKs7cVPU0jONzt3AjQ c=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D8AwBQoS5V/xbLJq1SCoNeXIMVwloJgVGGAQKBcxQBAQEBAQEBfYQhAQEEI0gNARALGAkWCAMCAgkDAgECAQ8lEQYNAQUCAQEVh30DEQ2vFJASDYUrAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF4osf4JIgVEGCwFRB4JogUUBBIRejiiBM1iEHDSBTYFXhUOHIYY+IoNxPDEBgQqBOAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,582,1422921600"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="432953117"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2015 17:37:33 +0000
Received: from [10.61.218.34] ([10.61.218.34]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3FHbW0m011301; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:37:32 GMT
Message-ID: <552EA1DC.6030606@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 19:37:32 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwbV9kHQ30S5tB8YgDVeMjkvAqJ_nBHEiSzUysB=2CV7Sw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwbV9kHQ30S5tB8YgDVeMjkvAqJ_nBHEiSzUysB=2CV7Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="40bIpC5TNt1Wu4H4HFaxmHaglFRlHtEo7"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/appsdir/X5Kl8E4FzX32J9cmyr_X06hP8Hw>
Cc: "appsdir@ietf.org" <appsdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [appsdir] Initial review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering
X-BeenThere: appsdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <appsdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/appsdir>, <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/appsdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:appsdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir>, <mailto:appsdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:37:41 -0000

Perfect, Murray.  Thank you.  I've asked Barry if he wants full reviews
for these sorts of documents.  Let's see what he comes back with.

Eliot


On 4/15/15 6:59 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Sorry for the tardiness...
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy
> <superuser@gmail.com <mailto:superuser@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com
>     <mailto:lear@cisco.com>> wrote:
>
>         For those of you who weren't at the AppsArea lunch, one topic
>         was apps reviews.  We would like to try an experiment, which
>         is to both identify the skills needed for a proper review and
>         a reviewer early in the life cycle of a working group draft. 
>         What follows is a list of recently published -00 working group
>         drafts.  I wonder if people could volunteer to just quickly
>         scan one of the following drafts, and email back to the group
>         only the following information:
>
>           * The draft filename (draft-ietf-wg...-00.txt)
>           * A gut feel as to how much attention it will need (and why)
>           * The sorts of apps area skills required to properly do the
>             review.  To get a feel for what people have listed, just
>             go to our favorite little wiki
>             <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate>
>             and look in the expertise column.
>
>         Just pick one draft off the list below and send it round when
>         you've done.  If it takes you more than 10 minutes,
>         something's probably gone wrong.
>
>
>     I'll take draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-00.  Will send it by
>     the weekend.
>
>
> I don't believe this needs much of our attention.  None of what it
> talks about rises (almost literally) to the layers of the stack where
> we tend to operate.  At best there are some security implications of
> these protocol options, but they appear to be addressed within the
> lower layers as well and aren't specific to any protocol or family of
> protocols at our layers.
>
> -MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email