Re: [appsdir] new drafts for review

I don't think it would be good for the integrity of the process if one
person did the review and another person's name was on it.  I'll take care
of urn-as-instanceid

On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 7:55 AM, SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:

> Hi Claudio,
>
> At 06:20 28-07-2013, Claudio Allocchio wrote:
>
>> Let's have Tim forwards his own full review notes to Martin, and Martin
>> adds his owns, and "sign" the review, thus we avoid the problem of a biased
>> reaction by the authors. Is this ok?
>>
>
> As Martin Dürst will be responsible for the review I don't see any problem.
>
>
>  In then mean time we also need somebody for draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-**urn-16
>> as Jullian cannot make it. Would it be a problem if Tim does this one
>> "officially" ?
>>
>
> There are two drafts:
>
>   (i) draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-**urn-16
>
>   (ii) draft-allen-dispatch-imei-urn-**as-instanceid-10
>
> I'll suggest Martin for draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-**urn-16 and Tim for
> draft-allen-dispatch-imei-urn-**as-instanceid-10.
>
> I'll suggest draft-petithuguenin-behave-**turn-uris-05 for URI review.
>  It's a short draft.
>
> Martin Thomson, would you like to review draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-**options-05
> if Claudio agrees?  If so, could you talk to Tobias and see when the draft
> will be ready for review?
>
> Best regards,
> -sm
> ______________________________**_________________
> appsdir mailing list
> appsdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/appsdir<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir>
>