IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] References on AQM test results and fq_nocodel

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Mon, 13 April 2015 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CF21ACDE6 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s2HtEk9jT3v8 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out5.uio.no (mail-out5.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:10::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 119301ACDE5 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx1.uio.no ([129.240.10.29]) by mail-out5.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1Yhgb1-0000cC-4P; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:48:23 +0200
Received: from mail-ex01.exprod.uio.no ([129.240.52.4]) by mail-mx1.uio.no with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1Yhgb0-0000GR-Nn; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:48:23 +0200
Received: from mail-ex01.exprod.uio.no (2001:700:100:52::4) by mail-ex01.exprod.uio.no (2001:700:100:52::4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:48:20 +0200
Received: from mail-ex01.exprod.uio.no ([fe80::5c5b:6cfb:485b:6990]) by mail-ex01.exprod.uio.no ([fe80::5c5b:6cfb:485b:6990%20]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:48:20 +0200
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
To: "Francini, Andrea (Andrea)" <andrea.francini@alcatel-lucent.com>
Thread-Topic: [aqm] References on AQM test results and fq_nocodel
Thread-Index: AQHQdgFDhleuDFqyOkSpsR3EBRpFtA==
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:48:19 +0000
Message-ID: <CD9871D7-0C3C-4397-AB3C-27A6F56E2B0B@ifi.uio.no>
References: <1BFAC0A1D7955144A2444E902CB628F85E092996@US70TWXCHMBA11.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <1BFAC0A1D7955144A2444E902CB628F85E092996@US70TWXCHMBA11.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, nb-NO, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [129.240.169.59]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <1C5BCACBD36EFA4FA7D0B1F92BF10563@mail.uio.no>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-UiO-SPF-Received:
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 11 msgs/h 4 sum rcpts/h 15 sum msgs/h 7 total rcpts 27743 max rcpts/h 44 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: CCDEE93CD853C2B81A478CF1E1092232D2CB1E37
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.52.4 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 96 total 690983 max/h 480 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/4Xxd1RnvfH9kTzDvNj2t63z9RTE>
Cc: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] References on AQM test results and fq_nocodel
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:48:27 -0000

> On 13 Apr 2015, at 17:40, Francini, Andrea (Andrea) <andrea.francini@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> 
> I need help finding a couple of references:
>  
> 1.       Besides the results in Toke’s ICCRG presentation at IETF 91 in November 2014 (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/slides/slides-91-iccrg-4.pdf), where can I find  other comprehensive comparisons of AQM implementations for Linux (or any other non-simulated system that handles real packets)? 

I think there should be quite a number by now - anyway one relatively recent evaluation study is:
http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~michawe/research/publications/infocom-gi14.pdf

Cheers,
Michael

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email