IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] Status of the GSP AQM?

"Lautenschlaeger, Wolfram (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart)" <wolfram.lautenschlaeger@nokia-bell-labs.com> Mon, 08 January 2018 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <wolfram.lautenschlaeger@nokia-bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED74B126579 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 08:17:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e9N4UDQVoGcJ for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 08:17:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur01on0106.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.0.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 674A412D72F for <aqm@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 08:17:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-nokia-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=PxZEfUYU55Uu+318KiCqVohh95E+1BxPUnfNqMktSV4=; b=cyezk7EPlZqNvKmYWagNv8z5HaN5hCsiTqY/IN0Bnqqz4w7jE4oQA55xUbLfr/yRww428f6y7NpbpdRRe7Xov4lz+600cMGkQO9o0tjsx6W7Tzp7qZ95sPtCkenBJeZN4Qti+n40QcTonZ/6QC9ZnyHBkplso2zEIE/XzrYiEf8=
Received: from HE1PR07MB3370.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.170.247.21) by HE1PR07MB0810.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.162.24.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.407.1; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 16:17:38 +0000
Received: from HE1PR07MB3370.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f0fe:ef80:d86a:881a]) by HE1PR07MB3370.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f0fe:ef80:d86a:881a%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0407.004; Mon, 8 Jan 2018 16:17:38 +0000
From: "Lautenschlaeger, Wolfram (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart)" <wolfram.lautenschlaeger@nokia-bell-labs.com>
To: Roland Bless <roland.bless@kit.edu>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
CC: "Francini, Andrea (Nokia - US/Murray Hill)" <andrea.francini@nokia-bell-labs.com>
Thread-Topic: Status of the GSP AQM?
Thread-Index: AQHTdSODRpbHK9Jb4kuiIpb6Cwc586NqO5LQ
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 16:17:38 +0000
Message-ID: <HE1PR07MB3370329512DA3865538206C4E9130@HE1PR07MB3370.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <468c391d-7e18-e67c-d1b6-b6526eb8d9e3@kit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <468c391d-7e18-e67c-d1b6-b6526eb8d9e3@kit.edu>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.245.212.19]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HE1PR07MB0810; 7:i47A/FHAepuV8LQReN+0HbhQmIIdyIfEZcwAlkIPwR10v4pSvM2kYV67XMUqFg8P25Mp5vS0Gq/8bUPMgGyhglS7vyFvBqR0kNvQR82t8Juv785iMkbP4RJPyP/aWfM7ELW1w/HW+zr09v/ShLufxmEqPMNrNgu742+OSWBWjxDLbK/i4fdCOYJW0XF3Y5rIMUwV3tVEXizJueWqK9GY2x0/aVzpC0lryT4MrgNSPHFkwYyC8IZdqRRm6AgkpKRN
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;SSOR;
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:SKI; SCL:-1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(39380400002)(396003)(366004)(39860400002)(376002)(189003)(199004)(13464003)(76176011)(53936002)(4326008)(25786009)(3280700002)(8676002)(7736002)(110136005)(107886003)(6306002)(9686003)(3660700001)(55016002)(6436002)(86362001)(99286004)(7696005)(59450400001)(305945005)(2171002)(6246003)(316002)(66066001)(102836004)(74316002)(6506007)(53546011)(14454004)(106356001)(561944003)(105586002)(2900100001)(33656002)(3846002)(97736004)(6116002)(2906002)(81166006)(5660300001)(2950100002)(5250100002)(229853002)(81156014)(8936002)(478600001)(2501003)(68736007)(90052001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1PR07MB0810; H:HE1PR07MB3370.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:3; A:0; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a0ee8b20-3c91-42d8-9d20-08d556b355ef
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020040)(48565401081)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(2017052603307)(7193020); SRVR:HE1PR07MB0810;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HE1PR07MB0810:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=wolfram.lautenschlaeger@nokia-bell-labs.com;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR07MB08103C5826E1D60726CEFFD2E9130@HE1PR07MB0810.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(101472597685257);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040470)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(3231023)(11241501184)(944501098)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(6041268)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560045)(20161123558120)(20161123562045)(20161123564045)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:HE1PR07MB0810; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:HE1PR07MB0810;
x-forefront-prvs: 054642504A
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nokia-bell-labs.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 0p2QNO/93FjFey4CNntvMaD9Y/qhT/Y+9KCTUDFQwMt5AJNwLfSvmpjzb47kfwjA03DRAjTm6DQPxCmPHwbLZg==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia-bell-labs.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a0ee8b20-3c91-42d8-9d20-08d556b355ef
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Jan 2018 16:17:38.2444 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR07MB0810
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/4gRs-WgbXy8n-e0t7uwYPOcDqQU>
Subject: Re: [aqm] Status of the GSP AQM?
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 16:17:46 -0000

Hi Roland,

Yes, of course, I am still interested in finishing the GSP draft.
If you have new results on GSP, we could finally take the long pending "independent opinion" hurdle, thank you.
If there is still some interest in the tsvwg, we could make a trial. My co-author Andrea Francini of the corresponding GSP paper (http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7483103/)  could contribute as well. 

Regards
Wolfram


-----Original Message-----
From: Roland Bless [mailto:roland.bless@kit.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 10:36 PM
To: aqm@ietf.org; Lautenschlaeger, Wolfram (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart) <wolfram.lautenschlaeger@nokia-bell-labs.com>
Subject: Status of the GSP AQM?

Hi folks,

I was wondering what happened to the GSP AQM proposal (draft-lauten-aqm-gsp see (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lauten-aqm-gsp).
Discussion seems to have ended after IETF 93 and we probably missed the point of discussing WG adoption.
IMHO this AQM should also be documented as RFC. It performs extremely well in some settings (better than CoDel or PIE) and its implementation complexity is also lower. Wolfram, are you interested in finishing this?
Should we continue in tsvwg?

Regards,
 Roland

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email