IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-12.txt

Kuhn Nicolas <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr> Fri, 10 June 2016 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C100A12D688; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.124
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.124 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY=1.157, LONGWORDS=2.035, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8aqBO-iZjd2h; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.cnes.fr (mx1.cnes.fr [194.199.174.200]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0349312D612; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,450,1459814400"; d="htm'217?scan'217,208,217";a="4059222"
X-IPAS-Result: A2FBBABP1VpX/wUBeApTChkBAQEBAYMgSQ19BoVErXCJYAQXAQwEgjiBW4FYAoEpPBABAQEBAQEBA2InhEYBAQEDAQEBFQIBEjsEAgIGAxACAQUDDRUWAQYHAiULFBECBAEJBAUIBgYFAogVDr4nAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBDg6JcYEDhAcKBwQBDRg8gm6CLwEEhXqCCweGGnqGSIJ3gy6CVoJ4gnCDIYEEFzeEBIMghCuBGo9rNR+BTDgCHYFLPDIBiEMBJR8BfgEBAQ
From: Kuhn Nicolas <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr>
To: "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>, "i-d-announce@ietf.org" <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-12.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRwyixa+UfxVfV60Gmr9Pc/xKUSZ/iy7iQ
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:03:05 +0000
Message-ID: <F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF8FD88F@TW-MBX-P03.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr>
References: <20160610145859.15519.98816.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160610145859.15519.98816.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-11.0.0.4179-8.000.1202-22384.000
x-tm-as-result: No--42.770300-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF8FD88FTWMBXP03cnesnetad_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/EvQUPnOCDqdJWUEVn25AuN3_FGs>
Cc: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-12.txt
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:03:22 -0000

All, 

Following the last discussions, please find an updated version of the AQM characterization guidelines.
The modifications are shown in the diff attached. 

Cheers

Nico

-----Message d'origine-----
De : aqm [mailto:aqm-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de internet-drafts@ietf.org
Envoyé : vendredi 10 juin 2016 16:59
À : i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc : aqm@ietf.org
Objet : [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-12.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Active Queue Management and Packet Scheduling of the IETF.

        Title           : AQM Characterization Guidelines
        Authors         : Nicolas Kuhn
                          Preethi Natarajan
                          Naeem Khademi
                          David Ros
	Filename        : draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-12.txt
	Pages           : 36
	Date            : 2016-06-10

Abstract:
   Unmanaged large buffers in today's networks have given rise to a slew
   of performance issues.  These performance issues can be addressed by
   some form of Active Queue Management (AQM) mechanism, optionally in
   combination with a packet scheduling scheme such as fair queuing.
   This document describes various criteria for performing
   characterizations of AQM schemes, that can be used in lab testing
   during development, prior to deployment.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-12

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-12


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
aqm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email