IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] WGLC on draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines

Polina Goltsman <polina.goltsman@student.kit.edu> Thu, 24 September 2015 10:49 UTC

Return-Path: <polina.goltsman@student.kit.edu>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8291A039A for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 03:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.791
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.791 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UjWQ5ryqg1os for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 03:49:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scc-mailout-kit-01-web.scc.kit.edu (scc-mailout-kit-01-web.scc.kit.edu [IPv6:2a00:1398:9:f712::810d:e75d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C2201A0398 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 03:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kit-msx-22.kit.edu ([2a00:1398:9:f612::22]) by scc-mailout-kit-01.scc.kit.edu with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (envelope-from <polina.goltsman@student.kit.edu>) id 1Zf45q-00041j-Ot for aqm@ietf.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:49:40 +0200
Received: from scc-wkit-clx-223-166.scc.kit.edu (2a00:1398:9:fb00:1acf:5eff:fe15:5525) by smtp.kit.edu (2a00:1398:9:f612::106) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:49:38 +0200
Message-ID: <5603D549.7000206@student.kit.edu>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:49:45 +0200
From: Polina Goltsman <polina.goltsman@student.kit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: aqm@ietf.org
References: <55C8AA8E.4000802@mti-systems.com> <55D3AB99.3090405@kit.edu> <CAEGuzz9XkmM8K8P4fD6dvUAO7hkYQNSzkT-A1LUTz=TnrX=L-w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEGuzz9XkmM8K8P4fD6dvUAO7hkYQNSzkT-A1LUTz=TnrX=L-w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050608020605020206000609"
X-Originating-IP: [2a00:1398:9:fb00:1acf:5eff:fe15:5525]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/JjZoHNR3QrkhN0jgvXV-LertbLk>
Subject: Re: [aqm] WGLC on draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:49:47 -0000

Hello,

We (Roland and Polina) need some time to review the new document and the 
rest of the email.

According to the charter, the document is still in last call. What is 
the next deadline?

Best Regards,
Polina


On 09/22/2015 08:38 AM, Nicolas Kuhn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry for the delay of our answer.
> We have just posted a new version of the draft that, we hope,
> assesses the comments of Wolfram, Roland and Polina.
>
> Following Wolfram's comments, we:
> - changed the units of the equation ( FCT [s] = Fs [b] / ( G [bps] ) );
> - mention only one reference for the latency/goodput trade-off graphs;
> - updated the "long-term UDP" terminology.
>
> Following the comments of Polina and Roland, we:
> -moved the " Methodology section " at the beginning of the document.
> - included discussions on ECN and scheduling in the methodology 
> section. I think it is clearer that way.
> - fixed the table at the end with updated section numbers.
>
> For the details of the changes, please see below.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email