IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] FQ-PIE? Re: working group status and rechartering vs. closing

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 02 June 2016 23:14 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889A512D8F7 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ufQQ5o51E6z for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1F0A12D8F6 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1704; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1464909253; x=1466118853; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=NnZlSsJJv9zAxIhAjWMRnh/7w5IIm44snD2VgPUdP0E=; b=YcEB9v7M33gifxseNf4rkJhviFqazu3TJV9PUuRRNwKm6zR++C6kThsr /GMRMmkjQNe78Zca2rbPXpjoZnDM5hMP45SZB63jY/yzkoTVQKFsDlynC AkktcdrtirG2hgvEeL/aXSa0hDo6oJb4082+3YhlmQJnjRds22d9YvqgZ c=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ApBQCGvVBX/49dJa1eDoMsgVMGvD2GEgKBMjsRAQEBAQEBAWUnhEUBAQEDAXkFCwIBCBguMiUCBA4FDogZCMJoAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBDg6IHoJWh2yCLgWYOAGDKoFoiQ2BUwGNSI9LATQggzM7bol9fwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,408,1459814400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="108892490"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jun 2016 23:14:13 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com (xch-aln-014.cisco.com [173.36.7.24]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u52NEDXX023036 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 2 Jun 2016 23:14:13 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 18:14:12 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 18:14:12 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: grenville armitage <garmitage@swin.edu.au>
Thread-Topic: [aqm] FQ-PIE? Re: working group status and rechartering vs. closing
Thread-Index: AQHRvSR5fhBx4ExHkUG4qZHPdRhwkQ==
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 23:14:12 +0000
Message-ID: <B844E81B-67C4-416E-B0DE-D7DE1BC5781A@cisco.com>
References: <74081931-bbc2-a3e1-4aac-5633306eecb0@mti-systems.com> <574F8A2E.2040302@swin.edu.au>
In-Reply-To: <574F8A2E.2040302@swin.edu.au>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.115]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_74013E04-6537-47E5-A654-B401696B58FB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/PYIfKLuIggatSWoq-2C48Jm2Xs0>
Cc: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] FQ-PIE? Re: working group status and rechartering vs. closing
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 23:14:15 -0000

> On Jun 1, 2016, at 6:21 PM, grenville armitage <garmitage@swin.edu.au> wrote:
> 
> I know there was a Linux FQ-PIE proof-of-concept discussed here many moons ago, but I don't know its current disposition.

If you're referring to our versions (2 of them), they were uploaded to github but not submitted to Linux. If you want to do the latter, be my guest.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email