[aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
"Benoit Claise" <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 18 February 2015 22:43 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A327B1A1B47; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:43:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P2rnAWYRZ5vG; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:43:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522901A0113; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:43:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.11.0.p2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150218224325.29443.89305.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:43:25 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/SLEI58o5-zKsWqIkZcVkamK5-aU>
Cc: mehmet.ersue@nsn.com, rs@netapp.com, aqm-chairs@ietf.org, aqm@ietf.org, draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation.all@ietf.org
Subject: [aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:43:27 -0000
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-09: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hopefully an easy DISCUSS. 3. The algorithms that the IETF recommends SHOULD NOT require operational (especially manual) configuration or tuning. This sentence above could be understood in different ways. For example, that any configuration is wrong. The ability to activate AQM is a good thing IMO. The section 4.3 title is closer to what you intend to say: "AQM algorithms deployed SHOULD NOT require operational tuning" The issue is that you only define what you mean by "operational configuration" in section 4.3 Proposal: OLD: 3. The algorithms that the IETF recommends SHOULD NOT require operational (especially manual) configuration or tuning. NEW: 3. AQM algorithm deployment SHOULD NOT require tuning of initial or configuration parameters. OLD: 4.3 AQM algorithms deployed SHOULD NOT require operational tuning NEW: 4.3 AQM algorithm deployment SHOULD NOT require tuning ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - RFC 2309 introduced the concept of "Active Queue Management" (AQM), a > class of technologies that, by signaling to common congestion- controlled transports such as TCP, manages the size of queues that Remove > - Network devices SHOULD use an AQM algorithm to measure local local congestion local local
- [aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-aqm-r… Benoit Claise
- Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-a… Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-a… gorry
- Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-a… Benoit Claise