[aqm] what do people regard as useful from the rrul tests?

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> Fri, 08 November 2013 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108DF21E814E for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 13:19:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.439
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.161, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rrmXCc9t70N9 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 13:19:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE20E21E8147 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 13:19:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id q58so2560315wes.28 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 13:19:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aZCOXNcqqoOhh64V1SCOSFOwxXGzzHBMoGjwp6rXSMw=; b=TLZ2gAn8pg+k3nJ23QIV6Yd7sXx0Hg3RJURWgIN7lENymL+4TzeR6tx5qM/c0OLcmh gOVf2dQsMA9ase41tAHaTbykIeg1PjrDyKa+mrvgR562iip5SkvRqTXe3d37H4YUl7Gd 2UbLwZMb1L162DxJH8tIYb5I0jC6GtbFYQzyMTsdyYiE9HOxdiyAy+mBXT+HFcxoQpAw gM2Qq8mv9E06h5jtX49QVOqYiFQQxgaaCYdlOtGY7RyiChqkY8CXLebmEua4J2D+TSyX 72zKpeGmE3MH5Zvd/ZUN6ElwvapK7PFwmqDG/5n1Ua9+Z1D7upwfHmg/Vnq8k0sWNuyn h+VQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id f5mr3990102wie.60.1383945585435; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 13:19:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with HTTP; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 13:19:45 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 13:19:45 -0800
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7mh3ceQ3KL_VSm+T3FJuQ3nG7G_NJxxRuUtWJjbVZhyQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [aqm] what do people regard as useful from the rrul tests?
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 21:19:49 -0000

As most of the graphs that come from my side are based o this tool,
I'd like to refresh people's knowledge of the rrul specification, and
work on revising it and the code this winter.


Already in the suite are tcp up/down,bidirectional, udp, vs udp flood,
mixed-rtt, ecn, and other tests.


upcoming additions are one way delay measurements in particular,
leveraging owamp.

Pulling useful metrics out of it rather than pretty graphs would be good.

Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html