[aqm] what do people regard as useful from the rrul tests?

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> Fri, 08 November 2013 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108DF21E814E for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 13:19:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.439
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.439 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.161, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rrmXCc9t70N9 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 13:19:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE20E21E8147 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 13:19:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id q58so2560315wes.28 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 13:19:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aZCOXNcqqoOhh64V1SCOSFOwxXGzzHBMoGjwp6rXSMw=; b=TLZ2gAn8pg+k3nJ23QIV6Yd7sXx0Hg3RJURWgIN7lENymL+4TzeR6tx5qM/c0OLcmh gOVf2dQsMA9ase41tAHaTbykIeg1PjrDyKa+mrvgR562iip5SkvRqTXe3d37H4YUl7Gd 2UbLwZMb1L162DxJH8tIYb5I0jC6GtbFYQzyMTsdyYiE9HOxdiyAy+mBXT+HFcxoQpAw gM2Qq8mv9E06h5jtX49QVOqYiFQQxgaaCYdlOtGY7RyiChqkY8CXLebmEua4J2D+TSyX 72zKpeGmE3MH5Zvd/ZUN6ElwvapK7PFwmqDG/5n1Ua9+Z1D7upwfHmg/Vnq8k0sWNuyn h+VQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.19.133 with SMTP id f5mr3990102wie.60.1383945585435; Fri, 08 Nov 2013 13:19:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.217.51.5 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 13:19:45 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 13:19:45 -0800
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7mh3ceQ3KL_VSm+T3FJuQ3nG7G_NJxxRuUtWJjbVZhyQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [aqm] what do people regard as useful from the rrul tests?
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 21:19:49 -0000

As most of the graphs that come from my side are based o this tool,
I'd like to refresh people's knowledge of the rrul specification, and
work on revising it and the code this winter.

https://github.com/dtaht/deBloat/blob/master/spec/rrule.doc?raw=true


Already in the suite are tcp up/down,bidirectional, udp, vs udp flood,
mixed-rtt, ecn, and other tests.

https://github.com/tohojo/netperf-wrapper

upcoming additions are one way delay measurements in particular,
leveraging owamp.

Pulling useful metrics out of it rather than pretty graphs would be good.

-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html