[aqm] Recommendations Draft discussion
"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 05 November 2013 23:30 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1632C21F8531 for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 15:30:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.348
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.348 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.251, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aMRuMZ0cu5Ed for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 15:30:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE3021F9BC2 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 15:30:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1995; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1383694237; x=1384903837; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=Ryv1OT4r21TpxjhBxkdHuDp+9awTtmS7cj430h672h4=; b=EKbbGZvqLNKHDHSthkrk5d+CTfOkR8AFH+fsAq3Gnk06/inNIg6P2LVR Gj9R3ej6Hr90/mdRSPHkODbqRyoq/+DcSgJxoLi668E3RRCPSncnFCxWH smHF6aHFtJEGGM4XPUY1r6tR4m5Tol16i7SzEuMvNJKPYUxte7bIAy6Af w=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhQFAM5+eVKtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABZgweBC8BtFnSCJQEBAQQdbgEgYCcEEw6Hc50loU2TAIEPA5AugTCGLJIJgyaCKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,642,1378857600"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="280964167"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2013 23:30:10 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rA5NUAti009659 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <aqm@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 23:30:10 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.122]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:30:10 -0600
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: AQM IETF list <aqm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Recommendations Draft discussion
Thread-Index: AQHO2n73JkSlcyICNkqxiw8Q+x6a7g==
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:30:09 +0000
Message-ID: <664F9AFD-9D16-449D-9BEC-0326BD87AB4B@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.75.25]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8101C671-A10A-4000-A5CD-6C80E7B22D74"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [aqm] Recommendations Draft discussion
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:30:46 -0000
On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:02 PM, "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com> wrote: > As the mechanism update presentations took quite a bit longer than we had expected - and we appreciate the discussion these presentations have sparked - we agreed with Fred to have his presentation as the first agenda point on Friday; the second agenda point will be a presentation around AQM evaluation process and criteria. What Gorry and I will try to achieve Friday is the high bandwidth discussion necessary to put the recommendations of the draft to bed. There has been list discussion of them, and we have attempted to address the points raised in the current version of the draft. If you will not be present Friday and have issues or concerns with the draft in any way, and especially with its recommendations, I would appreciate it if you could post them to the list *prior* to the meeting, so that they can be noted and discussed by those present. It would help Gorry and I if other people would do the same in addition to raising them at the mike, the point again being discussion and (with any luck) the achievement of consensus. What we'd like to believe is that we can do a quick spin on the draft next week, and the chairs can call for closure when that is posted.
- [aqm] Recommendations Draft discussion Fred Baker (fred)