Re: [aqm] AQM plans

Hi, I'm now sorry that we didn't schedule an AQM meeting slot in Buenos 
Aires.  We can certainly pre-load an agenda for Berlin with these topics 
though.  That is a long way in the future, however, so please use the 
mailing list to discuss tests and metrics, share results, advertise 
papers, etc, in the meantime on these topics!

On 2/26/2016 6:23 AM, De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE) wrote:
> Hi Wes,
>
> Just to let you know that we are still working on AQMs that support scalable (L4S) TCPs.
> We could present some of our latest results (if there will be a meeting in Buenos Aires, otherwise in Berlin?)
>
> * Performance of HTTP Adaptive Video Streaming (HAS) with different TCP's and AQMs
>     o HAS is currently ~30% of Internet traffic, but no AQM testing so far has included it
>     o the results are very poor with a particular popular AQM
> Presenter: Inton Tsang
> Duration: 10mins
> Draft: Comparative testing of draft-ietf-aqm-pie-01, draft-ietf-aqm-fq-codel-04, draft-briscoe-aqm-dualq-coupled
>
> For experiment write-up, see Section 3 of https://riteproject.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/rite-deliverable-3-3-public1.pdf
>
> * PI^2: PI simplified with a square
>     o PIE embeds some auto-tuning and heuristics, which can be removed by simple transformation of a variable
>     o Allows PIE to control also scalable congestion controls (DCTCP, ...)
> Presenter: Koen De Schepper
> Duration: 15mins
> Draft: (probably impacted)  draft-ietf-aqm-pie
>
> * DualQ update
>     o extensive additional tests, including different RTTs and mixed RTTs, better visualization
>     o using other AQMs than Curvy-RED for 'Classic' traffic, e.g. PI^2
> Presenter: Koen De Schepper
> Duration: 20min
> Draft: draft-briscoe-aqm-dualq-coupled-01
>
> Regards,
> Koen.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: aqm [mailto:aqm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Wesley Eddy
>> Sent: woensdag 10 februari 2016 20:27
>> To: aqm@ietf.org
>> Subject: [aqm] AQM plans
>>
>> Hello AQMers, this is just a quick note to be clear on working group
>> status and forward planning.
>>
>> Currently, all of the active drafts are either in WGLC, or in the
>> process of shepherd writeups to go the the AD.
>>
>> Once we get the current set of drafts out for publication, there are a
>> few things the WG can do:
>> - close down
>> - remain open to continue coordinating and advance algorithms (e.g.
>> within the standards track)
>> - remain open as a venue for potential new work (e.g. the DualQ Coupled
>> AQM)
>>
>> I think we should discuss this and plan to make a decision after the
>> IETF 96 meeting in Berlin (July 17-22).  We can have a "closing or
>> re-chartering" meeting in Berlin if it will benefit from face-to-face
>> discussion.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aqm mailing list
>> aqm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
>