[aqm] The Impact of Active Queue Management on DASH-based Content Delivery

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> Tue, 10 January 2017 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D2C12952B for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:08:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7-Bv7UZQbcvM for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:08:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x236.google.com (mail-qt0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17A2E129418 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:08:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x236.google.com with SMTP id x49so103508297qtc.2 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:08:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5zquKaUMDIrdWZDK4X+4T8ql6Nxqg0kb+d9Hat2M1Mo=; b=s18NTWyNcTCdX+ykma+XGHWYonhXsE3NmfNJhrqETMet3uhR1ovxhRwCKX7G+Y+zXR jAKlNvqK+Y+EVOW1/n5jSF+QwStHQDwaRz0gbsR8w2jrNt3Y8HzeWZuzYv0dEWuAslW5 KkBjxLxFw0STqqMkEkll80mKVH0SIiD5bT+R+238Xr0Kb8pxXvkZNZsQvBOo+CAHgJCi sVRBV5CtYmlISEQgxwRiEOC7bt0Mh4d12ACt+Ey/C2D3szSVC+nYAWu26dkSnLxW3lgL DGQBuZ1J8xp89e6LpvUGtK8u21i0fTVeoAIdfKsPLEK5aSdy+FO9PS1+Z5TbL5RzKfuB S2EQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5zquKaUMDIrdWZDK4X+4T8ql6Nxqg0kb+d9Hat2M1Mo=; b=MqpRXd21M9+ulRIPH/6jry+X+gMI+9wBIfPivLCqyLYR7uuKXvtzCb3YEz2u8QB8In gFO1sZxvhR7j9r6tiZA5R3Qmyqot9ErbzF/wVYy8pdM1tB4KXUwC/RyELjKFujr8R8l+ 51XtW4manm9F+XNngRRTz2iicfygFr3H3QnMDrK1NcaXA/42Z6/HUIPEu5d2MIyy0C/+ k6qdp9670+KzEwG84C/mfU2cxKkuqgd4tg31hNrwgUi9Jx5PCvWFGMO5r1hDzjLBaDyk xw37rZEiEpvnosOxfjNE6wTOL7JVQCAE/fT4MdDpffWZVxp4UZKklRcafkHYtqpeXVid MOBQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIfs27tLPFbBb/OD6Db9ki9DdLWpqPLdcDKAg0cpUtauE5quBYFwBXpfXXz0gFc1RTN28g0O9NtpTD7uA==
X-Received: by 10.200.0.193 with SMTP id d1mr3200050qtg.275.1484064508189; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:08:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.152.197 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:08:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:08:27 -0800
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7kWJhmr-Su+BptKYo7P7DUmo5vsLDswBcpZSia+KvyjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>, "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/Y7ZSEcAO_yr6AIpYFWcttb-sZSA>
Subject: [aqm] The Impact of Active Queue Management on DASH-based Content Delivery
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:08:30 -0000

This was quite good. I particularly liked the invention of the
"instability index".

Jonathan Kua, Grenville Armitage and Philip Branch, "The Impact of
Active Queue Management on DASH-based Content Delivery," in 41st
Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN), Dubai, UAE, 7
- 10 November 2016,    https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2016.24

(more easily available via: http://sci-hub.bz/10.1109/LCN.2016.24# )

I hope a test like this gets repeated against BBR (and for that
matter, cake), and against a larger dynamic range of bandwidths (4k
video, anyone)?