[aqm] aqm conference call results?
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> Thu, 26 June 2014 17:31 UTC
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0AB1B2C2E for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MhNCjx7Ixi3y for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com (mail-ob0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 642021B2C7B for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id wp4so4136174obc.26 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XN36khxLjTRX2Cr0pv1LQv8+NudYBh3gCvzt4hSOOAw=; b=dhFYFJZqa+TIJJTKVsNBucuiXqLqrVHEH0b/vGON+OUZfp30V7U9NsjmukjKy5zqo7 cHgM+7EBqcBytsTqD0WL3XtNun/ZOFzCZMotctRIEGJ5ayDSZmuQId+3V1KEUnKwfOvK Plyt5/HD/eKfU2b/NoCiSTUmZoz8xoQ8VPx3095qfMQOIpT4IaUeiq1nmVSVBDcpoZlr 5n7hvmBd291aSFael7Ve0G/9uYYvoHMoLEQbB70TwpCey49y1S3NiSOxsa0Y6AcQ/R5k pZYhvquAQTxjmW2+5Owsaar/7NnNIl5OwKHIKhx3PSDXg4QQW3BxFnvbJZLtnDmzyDvp /BJA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.145.225 with SMTP id sx1mr4758555oeb.75.1403803754826; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.48.200 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:29:14 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7ZXrD6TRm_FejsC95GJYqUv5e27M0KZnDuHpPd4QQcmQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/YSUMqeOFLyxeMzctMthvd6zqdiU
Subject: [aqm] aqm conference call results?
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:31:21 -0000
there some slides presented that I'd like to refer to as to the aqm evaluation guide's directions that I'd like to see again. Link? As it is being broken up into an overview and a second document detailing tests, I'd like people to look over the tests proposed in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sarker-rmcat-eval-test-01 as a possible inspiration. While I like the above a lot, it bothers me that it is only targeted at very low bandwidth scenarios (4mbit being the topmost). There are hopefully other tests proposed by other relevant working groups (ippm, http 2.0, sctp come to mind immediately), that I'd like to be aware of, and yet don't have the energy to sort through each wg to find. If there is a way to get a list of tests each wg considers important to work with, that would be a starting point. -- Dave Täht
- [aqm] aqm conference call results? Dave Taht
- Re: [aqm] aqm conference call results? Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [aqm] aqm conference call results? Nicolas KUHN