IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] AQM and ECN in draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-11

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 23 April 2015 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADF11A92FE for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CQy1sEpP-WAa for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:07:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A846B1AC3B7 for <aqm@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2353; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429801635; x=1431011235; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=2C4DVSDSCU2COZwq6ovabKdPTAP8zPqgHe0L3UilQJs=; b=Nw5RFlB3+EIL0IgTYUbrGHB48UNmhxfDzMDG3WNzU7N802gQXd1xYe+B TK3oiVZHPbohJstworCB1jQuKVOqUmVS78KQeBO/HYysA4z7EZz8fXRXa Djo7OGBaRGWJgMP89H4O9F5+zKpGuPI4cuL+5/QLuBdziSlVGK21v57aP I=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 487
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DvBgC1CTlV/5JdJa1bDoJ+gS4FgxXJVoESAoE2TAEBAQEBAYELhCABAQEDASNWBQsCAQgYKgICMiUCBAENBQ6IFQi3c5RjAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF4s3hQQHgmgvgRYFkUqBcoE3hwyVSyNgglc9bwGBQ4EAAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,631,1422921600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="414201554"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2015 15:07:14 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com [173.36.12.81]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3NF7DpC032285 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:07:13 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.172]) by xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com ([173.36.12.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:07:13 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>, Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com>, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Thread-Topic: AQM and ECN in draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-11
Thread-Index: AQHQfdctsOd8CA6bH0eQqTzbaO5JzA==
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:07:12 +0000
Message-ID: <F16CFD29-365E-417F-8380-378516F3FF07@cisco.com>
References: <5538D53D.1010908@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <5538D53D.1010908@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.121]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_09169CCD-938A-46FC-8807-D16B626536BB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/sQ0zbNdgSOu6VH5jR1mPLm1zG8U>
Cc: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>, "aqm@ietf.org list" <aqm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [aqm] AQM and ECN in draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-11
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:07:43 -0000

Bob/Gorry:

Didn’t we have essentially the same comment a week or two ago? What was our resolution?

I think it was a minor rewording that included a little more than s/threshold/parameters/, and which I worried was heading in the direction of a much bigger question - "what parameters".

Fred

> On Apr 23, 2015, at 4:19 AM, Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I know I'm too late for this but want to bring it up anyway:
> 
> draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-11 currently says:
> "An AQM algorithm that supports ECN needs to define the threshold and
>   algorithm for ECN-marking.  This threshold MAY differ from that used
>   for dropping packets that are not marked as ECN-capable, and SHOULD
>   be configurable."
> 
> But I think it should be:
> "An AQM algorithm that supports ECN needs to define the parameters and
>   algorithm for ECN-marking.  These parameters MAY differ from that used
>   for dropping packets that are not marked as ECN-capable, and SHOULD
>   be configurable."
> 
> so just s/threshold/parameters/  ...?
> 
> I've just caught this now because I'm reading draft-welzl-ecn-benefits-02; sorry. Maybe it's still possible to make such a small edit... if other people think as well that this should be changed...?
> 
> Mirja
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email