Re: [aqm] big science discovers sch_fq and pacing

Simon Barber <simon@superduper.net> Mon, 01 June 2015 05:16 UTC

Return-Path: <simon@superduper.net>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BF11A877D for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2015 22:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.791
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.791 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aSgl0ncdbeMz for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2015 22:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from masada.superduper.net (masada.superduper.net [85.119.82.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EE031A877A for <aqm@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 May 2015 22:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 199-116-72-167.public.monkeybrains.net ([199.116.72.167] helo=[192.168.0.17]) by masada.superduper.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_MD5:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <simon@superduper.net>) id 1YzI5W-0002UK-DM; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 06:16:40 +0100
From: Simon Barber <simon@superduper.net>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 22:16:35 -0700
Message-ID: <14dad8cbb98.27f7.e972a4f4d859b00521b2b659602cb2f9@superduper.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAJq5cE0602LsF89EW5VErCpEbuijNK40UcL5X9rCTKo=WR5mkg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw6-kJ2ryfK1aMAodi0gvdcXVwWn3D1zC-LvmZS_qhn8zw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJq5cE0602LsF89EW5VErCpEbuijNK40UcL5X9rCTKo=WR5mkg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 AquaMail/1.5.0.19 (build: 2100846)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------14dad8cce0a166627f743ba2d78"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/uVzS7x2OooeNxD4BHiwAelV1zfw>
Cc: aqm@ietf.org, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [aqm] big science discovers sch_fq and pacing
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 05:16:48 -0000

Why would disabling TSO would have such a large impact when he also states 
that there is 32MB of buffer?

Simon

Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com


On May 31, 2015 10:08:24 PM Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:

> My favourite part of that is "disabling TSO leads to a doubling in
> throughput". In precisely the sort of situation that TSO was intended to
> help throughput.
>
> - Jonathan Morton
>
>
>
> ----------
> _______________________________________________
> aqm mailing list
> aqm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
>