IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [aqm] Please review: Benefits and Pitfalls of using ECN

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Wed, 18 March 2015 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: aqm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4281A02BE for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 06:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6XpDfDK29AZu for <aqm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 06:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0929E1A033B for <aqm@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 06:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 06885A1; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:58:21 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1426687102; bh=yyKVbyt9Wk4Lg5A4lJ/skaLxV7Hp1T/Ni0AWGvdct0U=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TnLRFPh6fItqrFw8BLJsHoPPcRrl1rbEylSNuGIWHZSiDl6rE2B2imb8t0+NHi3fG gZRVh2uDse9+NA+QwilqhEGEHmr9YMh0LqP+oybifvXoBWRhML5gU8bBUXgTgkPV4I kJ/wwd3Yp8LTSFpCPLqpg+7YTDZ5TpMwxnHW34IA=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D5F9F; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:58:21 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:58:21 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <5509810B.8080808@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1503181456480.20507@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <8b6f280a-57b8-4dae-8c16-416846d615be@me.com> <5509810B.8080808@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/aqm/xEAXgp_08UL5fxwqN4SM-3llU54>
Cc: Greg Skinner <gregskinner0@icloud.com>, aqm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [aqm] Please review: Benefits and Pitfalls of using ECN
X-BeenThere: aqm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for active queue management and flow isolation." <aqm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/aqm/>
List-Post: <mailto:aqm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm>, <mailto:aqm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:58:26 -0000

On Wed, 18 Mar 2015, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:

>> Removing "pitfalls" in the title, and replacing its use in the draft
>> with "operational difficulties", or words to that effect, seems
>> reasonable to me.
>> 
> Thanks, this is something I think we can propose to the WG at the Dallas 
> meeting. Thoughts from others welcome.

I have read the draft. It makes sense. I have no objections or comments on 
the content apart from agreeing that using the word "pitfall" is something 
that would be best avoided.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email