IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] Possible IAB Adoption of draft-nottingham-avoiding-internet-centralization

Mallory Knodel <mknodel@cdt.org> Thu, 25 August 2022 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mknodel@cdt.org>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5AD4C1522D7 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 07:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cdt.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HhrkzzmHxAkL for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 07:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x732.google.com (mail-qk1-x732.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::732]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54BA8C14CE3F for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 07:05:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x732.google.com with SMTP id b2so15208367qkh.12 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 07:05:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cdt.org; s=google; h=in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to:content-language:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc; bh=cDlVJA/sQsTCQagolVCAXdCYd1FE8r4iBRHf6Dul5z8=; b=Ir+cRYwPyBZdqyMHgNakawmHEKWiqblRKpRVnVFknNjx0NjFWcokhMNRhpcXnhdnxc uC9Y4csvcjaqkWUG9pelmXeGe9pfD+YYx8GIT6VG91jjFXNMoX5a5nmGACEfm0m8mX3D Pkm2+VGaDIFuiXmb14AvW37KSTngD/cazHp1U=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to:content-language:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc; bh=cDlVJA/sQsTCQagolVCAXdCYd1FE8r4iBRHf6Dul5z8=; b=UizSntoDWqp3ws+7N6BS2T8lHh06xHX/M78ylkJ0J8a410Ry2wPfbPe4ImAYJrchoY 44CIiYvj+o6kSoi5gozfY359GEvj8SOX+4F6B3qxBxywzU4DktTSFGNt3lMKzXYYvM3K a2NU8M29Xk8sEEiMSyE8moNsphiLA0sq4KxjY4yEzDuIDFN4bGwkWQvhBeR97JCYyfXO /tN+XkwoMJSVezuNwWWAKbeLLNWLx4IYjfjB/Nsahao2K9QVR0ZHgPy9f8pLkEBOVwzH gEEvw/weexF2rIzRY1axcOnxAKPtbZOvYi+BSdrw3KelYLZctBm8E1Xoz286Tm+NRuHE SNPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo07NpayjFVZJTwWfBMHS6dzSYbzI7iI4KKPh8/nNoRAQ12qaYWS 6y2FFi366h58swp+DTayYeq8GQxDeP+uAQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR42E/t6a5Phdds5M1vH0cLctwnshaX/OZ5+fKJQic+XDwt3JqusDP1BPz90H4Rz+OCxQb8ayw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:298d:b0:6b9:bf26:c801 with SMTP id r13-20020a05620a298d00b006b9bf26c801mr3041367qkp.470.1661436317033; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 07:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.3.86] ([50.239.129.122]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v42-20020a05622a18aa00b003436103df40sm15624476qtc.8.2022.08.25.07.05.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Aug 2022 07:05:16 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------M8U5f5Rg41JsMa6aizkh8smd"
Message-ID: <0ef60c8e-38ab-6dff-ff69-f95f80b0efd9@cdt.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 10:05:12 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:104.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/104.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Dominique Lazanski <dml@lastpresslabel.com>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Cc: iab@iab.org
References: <166119246622.15164.113740897507466451@ietfa.amsl.com> <4768AC46-C5AF-4756-AF96-1481EF45CFCB@lastpresslabel.com>
From: Mallory Knodel <mknodel@cdt.org>
In-Reply-To: <4768AC46-C5AF-4756-AF96-1481EF45CFCB@lastpresslabel.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/3bThLq92XY2AhNfoo_u-WSqHXC4>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Possible IAB Adoption of draft-nottingham-avoiding-internet-centralization
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 14:05:25 -0000

Hi Dominique,

This is just my view: The three drafts are very different. Out of all 
three, I don't think draft-three-protocols should be merged with the 
others because it has a crisp idea that risks getting lost in expanding 
its purpose. Mark's draft sets its purpose most broadly, so suggest that 
you look for gaps, if any, that could be filled with some of the ideas 
you've presented in your draft.

-Mallory

On 8/25/22 2:35 AM, Dominique Lazanski wrote:
> Thanks to the IAB and Mark for all the work on this. I was wondering 
> what the justification for adopting this (Nottingham) draft and not 
> also adopting the following draft on the same subject:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lazanski-consolidation/
>
> Or, indeed combining these two drafts with 
> https://github.com/intarchboard/draft-three-protocols and coming up 
> with a draft? I’d be happy to do the legwork on that. Also the output 
> of the DINRG workshop should be taken into consideration and more 
> discussion on this could lead to some other RFCs.
>
> I’m not suggesting that this will be the one and only RFC on 
> consolidation, but I’m just curious why other drafts and discussions 
> are not being considered as well?
>
> Thanks!
> Dominique
>
> Dominique Lazanski
> lastpresslabel.com <http://lastpresslabel.com>
> +44 7783 431 555
>
>> On 22 Aug 2022, at 20:21, IAB Executive Administrative Manager 
>> <execd@iab.org> wrote:
>>
>> The IAB will discuss adoption of 
>> draft-nottingham-avoiding-internet-centralization (Centralization, 
>> Decentralization, and Internet Standards) on the IAB stream at its 
>> meeting on 2022-09-07.
>>
>> The draft can be found here: 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-avoiding-internet-centralization/
>>
>> The agenda for the meeting will be posted 48 hours ahead of the 
>> meeting here: https://www.iab.org/wiki/index.php/Agenda
>>
>> Feedback about this draft can be sent in response to this mail on 
>> architecture-discuss@ietf.org, or to the IAB directly at iab@iab.org.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Architecture-discuss mailing list
>> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture-discuss mailing list
> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss

-- 
Mallory Knodel
CTO, Center for Democracy and Technology
gpg fingerprint :: E3EB 63E0 65A3 B240 BCD9 B071 0C32 A271 BD3C C780

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email