Re: [arch-d] New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-avoiding-internet-centralization-01.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 21 January 2022 07:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDBD3A11BD for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 23:17:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=l86s3v0m; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=kF/ZzmZR
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nzc_hJQ04SDw for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 23:17:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 256403A0D96 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 23:17:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417F132022D0; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 02:17:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 21 Jan 2022 02:17:13 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; bh=/p0LE3YmFPGYNA bqERYvE08q0E4KkJixb2jeTBwAUSM=; b=l86s3v0mXp0WRTrjIRDCWjKyVQrxLf Q73F/VmZkkqW0guRixQVpnb5rhV4T0KOp0yE9QDNh8BRRUTrKQHcdOc8dsFk38cs SOzyjcxjqChEXcnmSji8jVKXnHUls3KGYgqVX3emMRBLns3WREujz2BbqL8E+Jyn 6J/ltunpxmgpV5Mr//KoomepfEwpNTozW/0OYfTgXMsJLWwAfslGNilQpiMem4a8 fXDLV0VmYOwnbajxF3onCVUOhWY4qQYx7gFU9klmk1W8kVB8CvVSrvjG5mQtLlsz lJqrfwNfREcEFDyCDB4DYC5xvUYBKps34BI1luiFLdhMKdgo1HH80ZJg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=/p0LE3YmFPGYNAbqERYvE08q0E4KkJixb2jeTBwAU SM=; b=kF/ZzmZRpQma5qIAOIpo/u37AZXmfBL+ijCTS7Qd9aWeDPU2CLVhamV2b 9g78UWRELJhCgfenbpLzaB22Tr4cU2HIrVAm7hOEyPzH0HfgmAOh+wErxpdbQHnM 8DlZSqKFI95C99bnCvUkKSNj+g3Q3cIQ6x0+JcmJvbYHNZSLLg3FR4fzH4DysO1r hpshYkYUt9JpweSYTYMt7FVmP8yStNNp3UUqu7FipyNHLVEz/aemmhj++8+3s/ww iypvmD1S0fzq+nQldblAIe4z9CDKUZdsFvSVbwrrCuEPKcVVmAqcYQwK1ZZwI23l iDYN20eL1MvO40+0MmL4lMaigJVDQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:-F3qYc0W9OLeZQBaPkSahKGvreWirhQ1Txe7hS7csHMIhtElsOzU-Q> <xme:-F3qYXH_WwEWy1vXjXTkiAmZrjB5rGAeVsFXaVLgeK8yd_Reut9pEOhCsV9xWEy4d jEJ6zJWOReiekL4ZA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:-F3qYU6hN629ugn_vv2S6KwvwBB1qkcR4qj3nuQ5nP8mIr0n5OjV1epfVor5Ok-QTfN_N1_KEZ2QHU6D-IlTT8BUXOwVujrgmYgL6z778O0-rI3uA6SyVSZK>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrudelgddutdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhrfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghr khcupfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepteduheejieeifeeltdevudekieegkeejfeekhfduvdetheehtdfhvdfhffef veeknecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghdpmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhnohhtsehmnhhothdr nhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:-F3qYV0uZ1johzkb3FIcEHx-EsGmYwPJeT6NL8BAxwQTENB0WId-Nw> <xmx:-F3qYfEPlvczLPE5PpbHXBNPl6AvMP7ohZbLaK_6xgChbHPB30ORjw> <xmx:-F3qYe_rSW5Pdpf4D0Pf3q8az-n-KW1XfqzmsMcFXyK1Yi7LZfy3RA> <xmx:-F3qYXBARJHD0ra6WAJbkni4zT4_tJX70ocDtxXamyZneZjwpk8USQ>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 02:17:11 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.40.0.1.81\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <230757985.6992.1641813463365@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 18:17:09 +1100
Cc: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CD54BF4B-66EE-4F8C-82E0-D4D9A33D5984@mnot.net>
References: <164171968336.24353.16126612424502758413@ietfa.amsl.com> <2D72A384-6402-49E8-8960-CBACB5A84DCE@mnot.net> <230757985.6992.1641813463365@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com>
To: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.40.0.1.81)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/5z2V3fN6HvbhyOOOFbDvDW817zI>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-avoiding-internet-centralization-01.txt
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 07:17:19 -0000

Hi Vittorio,

Thanks for the reference. I've been thinking a lot about intermediation recently as well, but don't know that I come to the same conclusions. I'll try to write something up (but it may take some time).

Cheers,


> On 10 Jan 2022, at 10:17 pm, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> Il 09/01/2022 10:18 Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> ha scritto:
>> 
>> 
>> Hello everyone,
>> 
>> Happy New Year! 
>> 
>> This is a bit more polished, thanks to some holiday time, some quarantine time, and feedback received. 
>> 
>> Responses and suggestions still most welcome.
> I don't know if you had a chance to have a look at the new draft I posted a few days ago to the model-t list: 
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bertola-everything-but-the-user/ 
> 
> It's a take (a personal position) on the discussion on a possible expansion of the RFC 3552 Internet threat model. It looks like we are attacking similar problems from different angles; especially the problem of centralisation - which IMHO is significantly worsened by having a threat model which considers non-user-controlled endpoint elements as out of scope, rather than as potentially adversarial intermediaries much like the in-network ones - and the discussion on multistakeholderism. 
> 
> On this latter point, commenting on S Moonesamy's observation and your recent reply, I would also say that the IETF is currently not a fully multistakeholder entity, not for the lack of formalized constituencies but for the lack of significant participation by many of the non-technical Internet constituencies. However, whether it makes sense for non-technical stakeholders to participate in a technical SDO - and how - is up for discussion, and as you will find in the draft, my suggestion is that non-technical stakeholders should come into play in selected situations, only when the non-technical impact of the new standard looks relevant. 
> -- 
> 
> Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
> vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com 
> Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/