[arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on age verification architecture
S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 09 October 2026 12:16 UTC
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4E1F46; Fri, 09 Oct 2026 12:16:25 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mx.ietf.org; dkim=pass header.d=elandsys.com header.s=mail header.b="pUlcR6R/"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx.ietf.org: domain of sm@elandsys.com designates 2001:470:f329:1::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sm@elandsys.com
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.117.138.134]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 699CGAhx018668 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Oct 2026 05:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1791548183; x=1791634583; i=@elandsys.com; bh=0z6VxILRfSdokjQp2/HRmwhE0QIRq5gXc00yY+Xg/9E=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=pUlcR6R/NZKtnH7oWn50BmaZrvsaN/qORD1/MzmyuCYY+vPGX8gPDnDvEnkgXqToK +wUi8P/eG0rNjIMNZh7J7K1sLahbfMvWUZ958cfgq30vJMIQ2ktN+zlYBTK8lqzr9W 0UXjT2xagCtA6v+9WJ2kSNlu4v8W+szP/2Mb1t9k=
Message-Id: <202610091216.699CGAhx018668@mx.elandsys.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2026 05:11:02 -0700
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, architecture-discuss@iab.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR11MB3392284E06330B58ADDA276EB5932@SN6PR11MB3392.nampr> d11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CABMXHrERKbB8LCZY2PSSEiKOtND_dBfFnm1piaKagvwnQrNxYQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABMXHrFCwannegAZT4STZhwLC2znC0mbJ=uRqfd2tMnJP+_1zw@mail.gmail.com> <CABMXHrEqqxb64azOnYQZJ7oKCetT+SrwxdMvxe=2V2+x_VT5yw@mail.gmail.com> <yblbjfvg24k.fsf@wx.hardakers.net> <CABMXHrGMdH_XatrnmwYTVYVcoHwbVpdVL-yLgFjb5CojhKBprA@mail.gmail.com> <ybleckohpu0.fsf@wd.hardakers.net> <CABMXHrGk=okXscd7jw2hkiT=Q9LYzn8BePrYnE4zRu9ukrXWDg@mail.gmail.com> <CABMXHrHzERe6kztQyGCTa_xxDg+hFMG6KYYEsz_H=RLvcXYQ4Q@mail.gmail.com> <MN6PR20MB64508C4F78702540B1D11549C1F02@MN6PR20MB6450.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <CABMXHrEpsYZVrAOMbzJAF+43XzZaRF2StOHwLXO3OdHsFna15Q@mail.gmail.com> <yblh5laewtw.fsf@wd.hardakers.net> <CABMXHrGf8cBfRBR5ZiwH=hQ65+16Sq3u2wbML+04E0+a6H0AdQ@mail.gmail.com> <58095542.13340.1791464464266@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <CABMXHrGWn4KM1__jB7uhyjaNVMC5j2=Qf8uEiPTT0qVZVNSGjA@mail.gmail.com> <SN6PR11MB3392284E06330B58ADDA276EB5932@SN6PR11MB3392.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
X-Spamd-Bar: ------------------
Message-ID-Hash: PRR7HSDZU7YBN4PPJSMK7WLH5SGN4WPW
X-Message-ID-Hash: PRR7HSDZU7YBN4PPJSMK7WLH5SGN4WPW
X-MailFrom: forwardingalgorithm@dmarc.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; header-match-architecture-discuss.ietf.org-0; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
Subject: [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on age verification architecture
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/6l5oJZ3VvYPWH7e0RZsZFb9mlvA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:architecture-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:architecture-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:architecture-discuss-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Robin, All, [Cc trimmed] At 09:29 AM 08-10-2026, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote: >I still feel that the IETF could have a useful contribution in this >space if it were to do two things: >Talk to some governments to understand what the minimum set of >requirements are that they think are necessary for individuals to >have safe access to the Internet (or perhaps just parts of the Internet). >Work on or propose technical solutions/architectures for the least >bad option(s) that satisfy most of the requirements from reasonable >governments. There was a government agency which organized a workshop last January. The IAB could have asked someone to be there if it wanted to talk to government officials which were interested in the topic. Someone would have to request a "BoF" if the person is interested in getting the IETF community to work on an "age verification" standard. There are other aspects as well (please see the message from Henning Schulzrinne). I would look into whether the requirements are workable and whether the solution will be deployed in more than one jurisdiction [1] instead of assessing whether the government is reasonable or not. Regards, S. Moonesamy 1. There were 29 governments which were consulted on the matter.
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Mallory Knodel
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Stephen Farrell
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Mallory Knodel
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Stephen Farrell
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Mallory Knodel
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Christian Huitema
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Mallory Knodel
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Christian Huitema
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Mallory Knodel
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Toerless Eckert
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Vittorio Bertola
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Mallory Knodel
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Re: Re: Internet … Wes Hardaker
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Re: Re: Internet … Kaliya Identity Woman
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… S Moonesamy
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… S Moonesamy
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Henning Schulzrinne
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… S Moonesamy
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Mallory Knodel
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… S Moonesamy
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Wes Hardaker
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Mallory Knodel
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… S Moonesamy
- [arch-d] Re: [Age-workshop] Re: Internet draft on… Vittorio Bertola