IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] Call for Feedback on the new proposed structure for Technical Programs and Administrative Support Groups

Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Thu, 12 November 2020 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7240F3A0639 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:29:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YxRCDoFhz4C3 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:29:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A69DC3A0769 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:29:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p200300dee707b600141061c179aad33d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([2003:de:e707:b600:1410:61c1:79aa:d33d]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1kdJDR-0002La-1W; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 21:29:09 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <5a803090-c188-088c-507d-4ff1f2ab78f9@nomountain.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 21:29:07 +0100
Cc: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6F24DB57-639D-473A-8FB6-CA4776F38BE4@kuehlewind.net>
References: <3036D6C9-A1F4-4035-B039-0C9E75DE55C4@kuehlewind.net> <5a803090-c188-088c-507d-4ff1f2ab78f9@nomountain.net>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1605212951;4452b375;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1kdJDR-0002La-1W
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/WYMgdZskW6NWhNaM2z5e81eJ1SI>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Call for Feedback on the new proposed structure for Technical Programs and Administrative Support Groups
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 20:29:13 -0000

Hi Melinda,

I should probably have said that there is a description on the IAB webpage about programs (https://www.iab.org/activities/programs/) which however is rather out-dated compared to what we do in programs these days. So the goal is more transparency and openness in the program itself but also in the way we maintain them. There has been no concrete event that this is a response to, if that was the question, but I think you know that the IAB has been discussing this for a while already.

Mirja



> On 12. Nov 2020, at 20:57, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net> wrote:
> 
> On 11/12/20 8:47 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:> The IAB has been working
> on refactoring its programs. You can find
>> the proposed description of the new structure and procedures on
>> Github [1]. The aim of this effort is to increase transparency,
>> visibility, and openness of the architectural work done by the IAB.
> 
> Out of curiosity, is this in response to a problem?
> 
> Melinda
> 
> -- 
> Software longa, hardware brevis
> 
> PGP key fingerprint  4F68 2D93 2A17 96F8 20F2
>                     34C0 DFB8 9172 9A76 DB8F
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture-discuss mailing list
> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email