Re: [arch-d] Fiddling with IP packets in the network, IPv6-style (Fwd: Question about SRv6 Insert function)

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Thu, 05 September 2019 01:30 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF681208D8 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 18:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NpWtZmmFBiQl for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 18:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6B7712004C for <architecture-discuss@iab.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 18:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (ppp-94-69-228-25.home.otenet.gr [94.69.228.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D6F786147; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 03:30:39 +0200 (CEST)
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: architecture-discuss@iab.org
References: <a7b5255b-8570-0e4b-da17-7557e7ca18c1@si6networks.com> <e1895609-e462-e47a-b408-568a5c5363b1@si6networks.com> <366eb210-dbd1-08c3-7dc1-483a4678656d@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <ae5ccbc2-d344-2dea-7954-ecb4c5b8ba26@si6networks.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 04:30:20 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <366eb210-dbd1-08c3-7dc1-483a4678656d@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/fDn5XPJHEU6-Sym9zsvuF2E84TI>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Fiddling with IP packets in the network, IPv6-style (Fwd: Question about SRv6 Insert function)
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 01:30:45 -0000

On 5/9/19 04:09, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> Hiya,
> 
> On 05/09/2019 01:47, Fernando Gont wrote:
>> But given this is an architecture list, I wonder if anybody has a say on
>> the topic? (including the IAB).
> 
> I don't "have a say" but I do have a question...
> 
> Given this is a WG document in a chartered IETF WG, I'm
> unclear why you're asking the IAB/arch-discuss. I mean,
> if the draft is out of the WG's charter or something,
> then raising that with the chairs and then responsible
> AD etc would be the path to follow. So I'm puzzled as
> to why you think IAB members ought spend time on this
> (given that I, and I guess other IAB members likely
> start out as ignorant when it comes to spring stuff;-)

Besides procedural issues, the ultimate implications of this is that
we're formally introducing middle-boxes that fiddle with packets in the
middle of the network.

Isn't this within the kind of stuff the IAB has interest on?
If so, better to tackle this now, than to publish an RFC5902-style
document when the cat is already out of the box.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492