[arch-d] The Internet, Architecture, Governance, Technical Work and Net History: A Speci

Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com> Mon, 22 April 2019 10:24 UTC

Return-Path: <gsenopu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DAF12001A; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 03:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eano027mha_y; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 03:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22a.google.com (mail-oi1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4705F120049; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 03:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id v10so8135033oib.1; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 03:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hG/830vZdoV7x91CGl/fqHBw7cLjNAlPDRNuSO2xE+8=; b=F3YP552zrq00qcANZunCn3LjoxEX3E5EoYzK4byxoiDwudPkStS4GppLuFnKdBk+HT O+wZY7258J0GbmegEGt85AYByyX7ha7ISrHSGsLrGWYnBYetWVNRT7ZyggH8snZ9LS3J nWj7dtJwyOkYkvNI4za8wd0e5b+JcozTsR8EhffGaRauShstquaWK/DWEyEbstKvr5uT 47iqHh9v0xfoTDcmfctCPP+QsmAQTCR8qtEefCb9nhhEd4tprV4MB8IqiDj4h1JI8xAR OMGZK1SdjEQQ3Ga2CjV9U0bzMNnnhPIs3uhcVvYvk4HqZNH4VJHeEyYQ2H+txBAGey4M ofqQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hG/830vZdoV7x91CGl/fqHBw7cLjNAlPDRNuSO2xE+8=; b=YNg3Axr+nB5efyNXpEzv/KPLKC754uutV+Og3asgfQY12o0UZeOAL5LGZtq7OjbWZP uBOL6Zgzlg6if/V8tGLuph0T0b/shJHSh57GuAzF46U4pXTApL17hmffFG/MKqG1ZXAI j/5RXzzZB2mRkf8b8OhnW5JKgiHi4NyqNRLIWwLTiXF7xgWG4NOZw2oLQIJZyYMboLIG 9oa8CS7PNZvAuo8WEvD79qjvp9kA6ktdVwTbT3XuHpEgygni27L83tfdlvoz00iT+KKh hlK4rRhXs+4TjQNK+iAPRibq771ftuq9varTIGPBFFX1I/iWEBa4b7yW3FsxsoZgMPq3 hUEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV4JwSmsA//e/bp7p1TkmbjCpqzZkqCwdj5pDw80XO9o3GCXOaI pKfJYiEetNKz/I4fHNKV1rOu61A240fmtW/w4VPH1w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzlD4Nu5kx0hVXO6L0eFm/J3NiWS1GZgoF3AmltZiBw6mvwzZjbtfS3MrlLya9uqR8VS0heJHy62Fg+YczRS8M=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:c5cd:: with SMTP id v196mr8865931oif.90.1555928667441; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 03:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a9d:2065:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 03:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 17:24:27 +0700
Message-ID: <CAKi_AEsFQLyNy3PZt0HR=Vid9HCgOviG_Hi5KPPU7CtvuZ352A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>, "internetgovtech@iab.org" <internetgovtech@iab.org>, "nethistory@ietf.org" <nethistory@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000084cee705871bdfe7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/z5_3MP0BpzTmoQpB6BnrIsM-2w0>
Subject: [arch-d] The Internet, Architecture, Governance, Technical Work and Net History: A Speci
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 10:24:31 -0000

Dear All,

Individuals, or collectifs of individuals, are in an age of the Internet.
It is such a presence may be approached and sensed by many ways --even when
one said that s/he had just eat a food which a receipt was gotten by
communicating by the Internet.

Among others there are presences of "the Internet Architecture", "Internet
Governance and Technical Work" and "Net History" as they represent
interest-based mailing lists. How could one get arrived into those matters
(together) --such a programmatic readership/learning: as sources and
concepts have history and discources collectives/net... ? Should we imagine
about information sources by making such a readership based on the linkage
between the three...? Thus we may say about "The Internet Architecture,
Governance and Technical Works: a Net History" (to say "A Net History in
Terms of The Internet Architecture, Governance and Technical Work)...?
--there would be a discourse map on the special readership which is about a
co-presence of mailing lists...? --as one may use search engines of each
mailing list for related interests...?

To make an engagement with the programme should we go with such tentative
journeys considering parts of the special readership...?


For example:
By considering the reasoning above:

To the question on "What is the Internet Architecture?" we may refer to
(archival) sources


"RFC 1958: Architectural Principles of the Internet"
(Carpenter, Brian E. Ed, IAB, 1996)

https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1958


(Note:)
It was a snapshot record of the principles of the Internet Achitecture
intended for general guidance and general interest...

It was updated by RFC 3439...

Both the concept "Internet Architecture" and the document RFC 1958 have
history bringing readers to other relevant sources... They supposedly also
give suggestions to come to broader or other conceptual discourses on
"governance and technical work"


Regard,
Guntur Wiseno Putra