IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [armd] draft-nachum-sarp

"Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com> Fri, 13 April 2012 13:36 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=9450bd28b1=hshah@ciena.com>
X-Original-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: armd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED1021F873D for <armd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.264
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.264 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EfCYxCBzsBtN for <armd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com [67.231.152.227]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5050421F8557 for <armd@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0001124 [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id q3DDYqLc032711; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:36:06 -0400
Received: from mdwexght02.ciena.com (LIN1-118-36-29.ciena.com [63.118.36.29]) by mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 146j240fgm-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:36:05 -0400
Received: from MDWEXGMB02.ciena.com ([::1]) by MDWEXGHT02.ciena.com ([::1]) with mapi; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:36:04 -0400
From: "Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com>
To: Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu>, Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:36:03 -0400
Thread-Topic: [armd] draft-nachum-sarp
Thread-Index: Ac0Sgw5RWwuA/nGwQkKo0eT2uKheZgG9kOMg
Message-ID: <B37E6A2CE5957F4E83C1D9845A0FFE38B168B02F@MDWEXGMB02.ciena.com>
References: <15B73861-C485-48F7-BB01-0F93BA0DB7AE@cisco.com> <201204041519.q34FJCMA017432@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <CA+-tSzyBPN0bzJ410n_bn1QSkDMn_fa7f9XoaaZAHkcR5XRnhg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+-tSzyBPN0bzJ410n_bn1QSkDMn_fa7f9XoaaZAHkcR5XRnhg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-6.800.1017-18834.007
x-tm-as-result: No--43.296500-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B37E6A2CE5957F4E83C1D9845A0FFE38B168B02FMDWEXGMB02ciena_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.6.7498, 1.0.260, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-04-13_05:2012-04-13, 2012-04-13, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1203120001 definitions=main-1204130113
Cc: "armd@ietf.org" <armd@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [armd] draft-nachum-sarp
X-BeenThere: armd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues associated with large amount of virtual machines being introduced in data centers and virtual hosts introduced by Cloud Computing." <armd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/armd>
List-Post: <mailto:armd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/armd>, <mailto:armd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:36:08 -0000

I agree with Anoop.
We did find a healthy interest on 'arp-reduction' approach based on bang for the bucks.
Besides draft-shah-armd-arp-reduction predates draft-nachum-sarp...

/himanshu


From: armd-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:armd-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Anoop Ghanwani
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 12:50 PM
To: Thomas Narten
Cc: armd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [armd] draft-nachum-sarp


On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com<mailto:narten@us.ibm.com>> wrote:

On the other hand, if we are seeing a renewed interested in using
proxy ARP for DC stuff, and we start seeing additional submissions in
this space, maybe the IETF should do something rather than have a
bunch of individual submissions appear.

I think there was always interest in this problem.  There were several
solutions posted earlier (prior to ARMD being chartered), but since
the charter excluded solutions, all of the solutions went away.

We have at least 2 other proposals that I'm aware of:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/armd/current/msg00176.html
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shah-armd-arp-reduction

It is possible that some of the work on directory-based
address resolution/mapping will make having a solution
in this space less important, but how that pans out and
how well it scales, etc. is still to be seen.

Anoop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email