[art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc7983bis-07

Marc Blanchet via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 09 January 2023 16:11 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Marc Blanchet via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: art@ietf.org
Cc: avt@ietf.org, draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc7983bis.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <167328066254.3749.18439149944819935858@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Marc Blanchet <Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 08:11:02 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/6XD3ODz8YPo4ps6yIIe1BgQnZNI>
Subject: [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc7983bis-07

Reviewer: Marc Blanchet
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed version -07. I did not read the identified references, so I
can't tell if the various code points cited are right or that the specification
is correct or not, but I found the document clear and makes sense, given that
source IP address and port will be different for QUIC compared to TURN so it
could be demultiplexed. I used to be on i18n directorate (which merged into
ART) to review i18n related issues, so, on that topic, I see no i18n issues at
all.

One possible nit (English is not my native language):
s/Were SRTP to be/Where SRTP to be/

[art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-avtco… Marc Blanchet via Datatracker