Re: [art] Review for internationalization

[Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>]

Sure, Chris.  Please go to the datatracker page for the document and
request an ART Area review (using the "Request Review" button).  In
the comment field, put the notes that you sent below, so the assigned
reviewer will see them.  I'll assign a reviewer from there.

Barry

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 1:50 AM Chris Inacio <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Sorry if this is a duplicate.  The NFSv4 WG would like a review for internationalization.  Can we get the following:
>
> * A review of the idna-related sections for our internationalization document (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-internationalization/).  These are changes made after rfc7530 was published since adoption and acceptance of the approach in rfc7530 isn’t really accepted.
>
> * Also, (just copying Zahed words on this item): Some analysis/follow-up on our approach to the earlier internationalization review (by N. Williams), which involved adopting some of his ideas (see the acknowledgements) but rejecting others as waaaay out of scope (no response in the internationalization document itself.  It is not that I expect people to be any more favorably disposed to Nico's comments than I was but I think we need to "close the loop" here and would prefer that they agree, if possible, that our approach is OK.
>
> I think this is already accepted for review though.
>
> ----
> Chris Inacio
> [e-mail]
>
>
>