IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-15: (with COMMENT)

"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Wed, 14 December 2016 11:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D952B129D66 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 03:28:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zZEVGheavTDJ for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 03:28:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kuehlewind.net (kuehlewind.net [83.169.45.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 815A5129D8F for <art@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 03:28:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 11902 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2016 12:28:08 +0100
Received: from p5dec2786.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO ?192.168.178.33?) (93.236.39.134) by kuehlewind.net with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 14 Dec 2016 12:28:07 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR01MB267046E124566842A5F81EF0BE9A0@MWHPR01MB2670.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 12:28:07 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <175F40E0-B527-40AD-9915-F69DE8E8AE86@kuehlewind.net>
References: <148164612085.29338.16482342179318328081.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <MWHPR01MB267046E124566842A5F81EF0BE9A0@MWHPR01MB2670.prod.exchangelabs.com>
To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew.kerwin@qut.edu.au>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/BBuG9xXLSeoRtld67QId7aFw1AM>
Cc: "appsawg-chairs@ietf.org" <appsawg-chairs@ietf.org>, "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme@ietf.org>, "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Subject: Re: [art] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:28:16 -0000

Sorry… I read ‚possible‘ instead of ‚impossible‘... I read the sentence at least twice and didn’t manage to phrase but that’s my fault... too much draft reading i guess... forget about it.


> Am 14.12.2016 um 01:29 schrieb Matthew Kerwin <matthew.kerwin@qut.edu.au>:
> 
> Hi Mirja,
> 
> From: Mirja Kuehlewind [mailto:ietf@kuehlewind.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, 14 December 2016 02:22
>> 
>> 
>> 'not' missing?
>> s/It would be impossible for this
>>   specification to list all such significant characters and device
>>   names. /It would not be impossible for this
>>   specification to list all such significant characters and device
>>   names. /
> 
> No, it would be impossible to list them all.  Instead the onus is on the 
> implementer to research their targeted systems.
> 
> The text could be changed to say "It would not be possible..." if that would 
> help.
> 
> Cheers
> -- 
> Matthew Kerwin | QUT
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email