Re: [art] Need some more feedback on httpi draft

Hernâni Marques (p≡p foundation) <hernani.marques@pep.foundation> Thu, 26 July 2018 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <hernani.marques@pep.foundation>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39E5130E0E for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 10:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m_nHxOK2CT0t for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 10:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dragon.pibit.ch (dragon.pibit.ch [94.231.81.244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D7F712F1AC for <art@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 10:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.pibit.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC51171C06D for <art@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:59:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dragon.pibit.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dragon.pibit.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JxtdiXppVo1p for <art@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:59:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.43.123] (4.225.197.178.dynamic.wless.zhbmb00p-cgnat.res.cust.swisscom.ch [178.197.225.4]) by dragon.pibit.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93D57171C057 for <art@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:59:55 +0200 (CEST)
To: art@ietf.org
References: <20180726032617.Horde.Lbs3jBh8t8i13_hcsVTLDFR@box439.bluehost.com> <20180726144138.C6F6D2002D9C7C@ary.qy> <01QVBLET1D4Q0002TJ@mauve.mrochek.com>
From: "Hernâni Marques (p≡p foundation)" <hernani.marques@pep.foundation>
Openpgp: id=31733E0C598D3A1CF70955D6CB5738652768F7E9
Message-ID: <8b0dee94-6bf5-f93f-6127-7b2ad37c7040@pep.foundation>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:59:54 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <01QVBLET1D4Q0002TJ@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uYhXvMjIhslLJSjTE4F7klwPtydpobeb6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/BNy5zXfLzTQv5kiqT4-K8rTatq0>
Subject: Re: [art] Need some more feedback on httpi draft
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 17:00:04 -0000

On 26.07.2018 17:18, Ned Freed wrote:

> And all this was back when privacy concerns were, if anything, an afterthought.
> These days the potential liability created by new laws make this idea
> completely impractical.
> 
> tl;dr: This is a nonstarter.

Especially considering that after GDPR went into effect lots of
registries (e.g., in the US) went over to mask whois data; it would also
create additional spam problems with data harvesting.

-- 
p≡p foundation: https://pep.foundation/