IETF Logo Mail Archive

[art] Re: [Uri-review] Re: Alternative representation of URIs in YANG

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Fri, 23 January 2026 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: art@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: art@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816C5AC3D30C for <art@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 14:57:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cxer66ZTGc-5 for <art@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 14:57:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-dl1-x122b.google.com (mail-dl1-x122b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::122b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32B31AC3D302 for <art@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 14:57:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-dl1-x122b.google.com with SMTP id a92af1059eb24-12331482b8fso2859127c88.1 for <art@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 14:57:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1769209013; x=1769813813; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UfefpMN1mSnySudfftp8r/wPlGfBmhZvwkrYaprP0/Y=; b=IGZ4SsMpMsxe7sZ2YT8MfaGFJJ3yq8vFU/uEpGF4zVPFobXV/yCyaM6t/feKxM1gR7 AvyxpP0lAZJJ9Ww/TZtwj3p+hCjoWzc1XFSnBLaw9aRYxEq4br0UxiDqMhcUxwvctNE+ 5pgNBwWHD+WsBINcQkIYe+r9lBAIY11GLNjzOKezASIEY3Lr0Efuzic8SRHynNGW2tRQ J3uFvW8nInIhA1n/mYT+Y+gaAmWwd1sbprDL0hNexTCbiho/t4zNIlbwrK0vXKqizySv M4wRUGzPlqH04bTvImtZQYNbDo1jVS0sfkdd7T22aJ12ZD1Ed2r2R88srUXpvQ1ig0VO VKQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1769209013; x=1769813813; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=UfefpMN1mSnySudfftp8r/wPlGfBmhZvwkrYaprP0/Y=; b=m9Or49RrqJp+KHZkhMlNoYMgpwOfcFL6tGyQA98iTUBG/IKcuZRoWL46AgPgwgk+Cm tM3yQIIGWRhD+SBBIZKrXOdl/NIZYL11YTUOr2TVhEcElBSGByfTChC5UHEGLE2+7/56 72itLbVwblxU6r5igFws9VXKUbflfKH4sBxJg/Fi0WBoxLOYhFNHzc8SMAF08noE2uAc nlJaMTMJXOXqvexUggzJnLoB9vsr2qG3jmc2ecKFDI/APh/BB/xrnfNSVLIqarsFx4L5 IdzIKt3mfUib8vMcF8O4f3qfcGczxT+zZQ5mXXrICrWGBvOawnjUflY/zvk1ByQnx1iR MD3w==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXaXCfsFnW/C98tTr2VhgMaFyXA8cKSiG96ClBB47PsIfpEX23iiaiUxWY2DhjhWPLyzkU=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwrirWapqtFRxn3xoOkWwEqdIm1C8RlFoz98jBnuu6Xg9meCD1N x1rrrQs0QzmSusRYkQ7O/F/8zYfXaW7i/V4InullPUDHZy+FN3PURLDu
X-Gm-Gg: AZuq6aILlVDW/FJ8ur57hY+D3yO5iNJi3I9tla/51nfRicJ27b6YjM9Bg66wvbXA7hu NsR27CGcem/b9rh4T9hpaKq/ltdAG1Zeb0uhNGSNI7+tjoetKS3qcNZDZ6+RaEsFBL/4c28WHQz IsUyTaYtWEYm4niatUQp8pCNp6gFftbvv9vUt9SmuaqSILNQ/5QLVAHxTnb+QetT1AXqLWIpIJC zmut0M0iJG+phS76iO0DOjXl8n9y3JmGgf9183j74cdZlPFHL5w57n6rh1cZu+7fdfWfvVXwNlv DBCOpr0uEDWjfzivF1EGMz7DMz2VwEIIjMqKLosEnStfbmWNevkFKrz9yKac/aeQrzX6GSq5368 KZFaG9psWm5H2ENTBvUf/WTIbiJPJ1QgTstAmN46Rxl1CXjcuGjjIqDrAOsSYRv0QuOFjxsEXyR QVcDuYelCfL/xOBKlpSyy4rxaMQwX1dAyqQgYSf7kGMZKfopYgh57Sgtwn2DaxiWagtOMjlz5ou wqgbg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:7300:6ca8:b0:2ac:1e9f:a0ed with SMTP id 5a478bee46e88-2b739b7437cmr3278177eec.25.1769209012497; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 14:56:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-67-180-189-3.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.180.189.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5a478bee46e88-2b749e301f0sm2577193eec.35.2026.01.23.14.56.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Jan 2026 14:56:52 -0800 (PST)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <D7A3B7FB-0284-4DCF-B840-8114860A0FDD@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_47DC88AC-E84C-4E8A-9233-1F6E523E1BD8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.21\))
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 14:56:40 -0800
In-Reply-To: <f5bjyx8y0v0.fsf@lochinver.inf.ed.ac.uk>
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
References: <87zf669z4x.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <0100019be639037e-5401829e-3666-454e-b2c1-e9ac65a04ac5-000000@email.amazonses.com> <e1356eb8-31ba-47ce-9a1f-8d42713184a9@betaapp.fastmail.com> <263D72B1-54D9-47BA-9787-8A3F3889A6ED@gmail.com> <f5bjyx8y0v0.fsf@lochinver.inf.ed.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.21)
Message-ID-Hash: 3PG7ONXD77PXW4RSW6DY5NP2RWDCP2H5
X-Message-ID-Hash: 3PG7ONXD77PXW4RSW6DY5NP2RWDCP2H5
X-MailFrom: mjethanandani@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-art.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>, tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>, art@ietf.org, "uri@w3.org" <uri@w3.org>, uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [art] Re: [Uri-review] Re: Alternative representation of URIs in YANG
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/MXGkNHLc1m3l3zGKRTbwGKhKtdA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:art-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:art-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:art-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Henry,

Can you provide a specific example of how the current definition of 'ietf-uri’ in YANG does not meet the requirements of configuring HTTP?

Thanks.

> On Jan 23, 2026, at 4:22 AM, Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Mahesh Jethanandani writes:
> 
>> How about we go with option 2 that limits the applicability of the definition to the following:
>> 
>> The 'ietf-url' module defines a YANG 'grouping' for a URL described as a
>> constrained subset of the URI defined in <relref section="3" target="RFC3986"/>.
> 
> Just changing the 'i' to a 'u' doesn't change the fact that it's no
> longer a UR[IL] if it's restricted to 'HTTP', so IMHO it's still
> misleading.
> 
> ht


Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status