Re: [art] Request for review of draft-devault-bare-07
Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Tue, 07 June 2022 13:55 UTC
Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82565C157B5A; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 06:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.973
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.973 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XvruVll-pg88; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 06:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4F6BC157B49; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 06:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:420:c0c0:1001::6b1] ([IPv6:2001:420:c0c0:1001:0:0:0:6b1]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-18) with ESMTPSA id 257DthNv974434 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:55:44 +0200
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1654610144; bh=nfsX9u34YKl3NXs/wkNweD+DiGWqfLrHSGES/RADdVo=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=rviiKqvsbbRKxIBGxMqVFBrqiBVWbvgfvpx/1FMgm6EFP4we99+2eiwzd+haTdqOi BH5Be2yS+UDOmgCEE/cACqYjpPdCL47ta6+E5hwXi5uH6tAH6HZEu5vwaZdcxKucCL JdJi4Hpup/6D7bNPjYNw2PE4fDWmAG4OM2fZKnno=
Message-ID: <fae7b4c6-2b5a-6c10-1f7e-7b82baea9e6f@lear.ch>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 15:55:40 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Jiri Vlasak <jiri.vlasak.2=40cvut.cz@dmarc.ietf.org>, art@ietf.org
References: <Yo5PRPYfVwNiz2t6@cvut.cz>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
In-Reply-To: <Yo5PRPYfVwNiz2t6@cvut.cz>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------9u0NktPaWXy6TAJ5L96CiEgq"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/Q2Sicq0wWSPmOctIKK-UelK9lu8>
Subject: Re: [art] Request for review of draft-devault-bare-07
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 13:55:57 -0000
This message got held up in a queue, and so I am replying to it so that people might not miss it. Eliot On 25.05.22 17:46, Jiri Vlasak wrote: > Dear Members of the Applications and Real-Time Area, > > I am resending the message as the first one, sent from my gmail account, > did not arrived to the mailing list. > > After consulting with the Independent Submissions Editor, I would like > to ask for your feedback on the Binary Application Record Encoding > (BARE) Internet-Draft [1]. > > It is intended to go through the IETF standardization process so that > BARE can be published as an RFC in the Standards Track. > > The BARE has been discussed in the technical community, including > implementers of BARE [2][3]. > > > Thank you, have a nice day, > Jiri > > [1]: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-devault-bare-07.html > [2]: https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/public-inbox?search=bare > [3]: https://git.sr.ht/~qeef/draft-devault-bare/ > > _______________________________________________ > art mailing list > art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art >