[art] [Errata Rejected] RFC6902 (6351)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 09 December 2020 15:37 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073FB3A0DC4; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 07:37:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7FDUrzQrvzRv; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 07:37:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C0093A0E02; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 07:37:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D2E2BF4073A; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 07:36:55 -0800 (PST)
To: palle@4thex.com, pbryan@anode.ca, mnot@mnot.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: barryleiba@computer.org, iesg@ietf.org, art@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20201209153655.D2E2BF4073A@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 07:36:55 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/Sx9rnJBDoIEB0l7fxpx-7nJwgoA>
Subject: [art] [Errata Rejected] RFC6902 (6351)
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 15:37:08 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6902, "JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Patch". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6351 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Palle Cogburn <palle@4thex.com> Date Reported: 2020-12-09 Rejected by: Barry Leiba (IESG) Section: GLOBAL Original Text ------------- Corrected Text -------------- Notes ----- If the patch elements included a property "previous" that contained the original value in case of an operation such as "remove" for instance, it would be easy to create the reverse operation - "add". In that way the path elements can be used as audit records and it is easy to revert a path or even a part of a patch, so the document is back to a previous version. All you have to do is apply the reverse patch and also add those elements to the audit trail. Is this something to consider adding to this document or is it an implementation detail? --VERIFIER NOTES-- This is a feature request, not an errata report, so it is rejected as an errata report. The suggested feature should be discussed on an appropriate mailing list to see if there is interest in adding this feature. -------------------------------------- RFC6902 (draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-10) -------------------------------------- Title : JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Patch Publication Date : April 2013 Author(s) : P. Bryan, Ed., M. Nottingham, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Applications Area Working Group APP Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [art] [Errata Rejected] RFC6902 (6351) RFC Errata System