Re: [art] IMPORTANT NOTE [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7595 (7011)

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Fri, 01 July 2022 15:24 UTC

Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2022 11:24:12 -0400
Message-ID: <0668df52-dff0-cf60-0cb8-64cfb4fa21fc@iecc.com>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, dthaler@microsoft.com, tony+urireg@maillennium.att.com, ted.ietf@gmail.com, Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: art@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20220701041518.1296731768@rfcpa.amsl.com>
References: <20220701041518.1296731768@rfcpa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/TXxTUKlugEbuqeJxqTlrnE6B9o8>
Subject: Re: [art] IMPORTANT NOTE [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7595 (7011)
Precedence: list

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS ERRATUM.

This person has a history of threatening to sue us so I am referring this 
to our lawyer.

R's,
John

On Thu, 30 Jun 2022, RFC Errata System wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7595,
> "Guidelines and Registration Procedures for URI Schemes".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7011
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Timothy McSweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
>
> Section: 3
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> [RFC3986] defines the overall syntax for URIs as:
>
>               URI = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]
>
>   A scheme definition cannot override the overall syntax for URIs.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> [RFC3986] defines the generic syntax for URIs as:
>
>               URI = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]
>
>   A scheme definition cannot override the generic syntax for URIs.
>
> Notes
> -----
> There are two instances here where [RFC3986] is incorrectly referenced by using the word 'overall' and should instead be replaced with the term 'generic' as it is uses the identical example from https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3986#section-3
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7595 (draft-ietf-appsawg-uri-scheme-reg-06)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Guidelines and Registration Procedures for URI Schemes
> Publication Date    : June 2015
> Author(s)           : D. Thaler, Ed., T. Hansen, T. Hardie
> Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
> Source              : ART Area General Application Working Group
> Area                : Applications and Real-Time
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

[art] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7595 (7011) RFC Errata System
Re: [art] IMPORTANT NOTE [Technical Errata Report… John R. Levine