IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] [core] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls-07

"Kovatsch Matthias" <kovatsch@inf.ethz.ch> Wed, 12 April 2017 10:17 UTC

Return-Path: <kovatsch@inf.ethz.ch>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D7C13156F; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 03:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1wIti_YFikCH; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 03:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge20.ethz.ch (edge20.ethz.ch [82.130.99.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D410128AB0; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 03:16:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CAS21.d.ethz.ch (172.31.51.111) by edge20.ethz.ch (82.130.99.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:16:53 +0200
Received: from MBX210.d.ethz.ch ([fe80::ed77:7d47:9467:69a9]) by CAS21.d.ethz.ch ([fe80::55ba:c4a5:d8a7:ab62%10]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:16:57 +0200
From: Kovatsch Matthias <kovatsch@inf.ethz.ch>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
CC: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, "core@ietf.org" <core@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [core] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls-07
Thread-Index: AQHSs3TkWi82eiIOykGDazObnipNOqHBg/mw
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:16:56 +0000
Message-ID: <55877B3AFB359744BA0F2140E36F52B558B2B97A@MBX210.d.ethz.ch>
References: <149179722452.3118.982908107963516290@ietfa.amsl.com> <5E5238DC-B835-4BDF-B50D-8D594A46C4D4@tzi.org> <7DEDD3CB-B812-4151-97DC-403448C1080B@mnot.net> <55877B3AFB359744BA0F2140E36F52B558B2A929@MBX210.d.ethz.ch> <cc7b5d80-21f1-e38b-4739-f44d536cf260@isode.com> <E882ABDC-F4E1-4EDD-A90C-D32EB5B0A639@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <E882ABDC-F4E1-4EDD-A90C-D32EB5B0A639@mnot.net>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-CH
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [188.195.112.97]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/Ws2YGHS3OuWuqwEjYiRfboOODm0>
Subject: Re: [art] [core] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls-07
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:17:04 -0000

> >> I am not sure what is the preferred way to solve the async communication
> issue of HTTP. Server Sent Events, for instance, are already pretty close to the
> Observe mechanism. Maybe we could properly fix the push support of HTTP to
> counter the endless stacking of protocols a bit?
> > We have a WG for this:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/webpush/about/
> 
> Well, yes and no. My understanding is that web push is designed for a very
> specific use case / deployment scenario, and it is likely not appropriate for other
> uses.

This is also my conclusion about this variant of HTTP push.

Best wishes
Matthias

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email