Re: [art] [apps-discuss] IRC URIs to denote users

Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> Sun, 09 October 2016 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00141129573 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Oct 2016 09:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QyP2928D-WLE for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Oct 2016 09:32:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEB2F129427 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Oct 2016 09:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id z190so68855517qkc.2 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 09:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YKe4ICJNRMvC2sKbC0kAUvhQ0GljDyo4kAxLjgwn4RM=; b=G5TlZV8sMewXyPSXdSt+w4PCQmSYNEfB9t19F5gkNNsoGSQ6b/AzGK62o0lLLvQA4L gY72Z9fppZnjLcDMY5hFlO8lpRBhGzMUtCdqkTZJ8CLmdKMX/gau/PDyC4mDSQTehKQg BuScOGIgyUqJODQQ4I48OCrjFjnEKmP93loqF3iLLiP3ItQpahgCyI/kNCqa9Tq2LZz4 1U2JLZ0CtRqijmiIBvDsICGTE26XGVRP9GgTBNYCTX7z+v6jW0CSAaykiJSd5yfp1sCL 4iecRzrqI/1DMvJL5bncen1hyjxQ++1f1RelZVfbLkh6WcJh8fHyfUS+i5GwdtTVYre7 FDUg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YKe4ICJNRMvC2sKbC0kAUvhQ0GljDyo4kAxLjgwn4RM=; b=M0SxrSb0AMz/vrVKyXQdbSbacYvAEiy1SyhSB921Y8sx4vpx0ZOpycc+62UY8ruwUM 1GulL3W9Qr2dn7+NKGY1N6DrFnxkfLp9IG0B1PA3UZTqeopy9zhKM1NKLOe0y5J8tWdP Y2OU1hew/EdY4v03QB+/EQKlVZxKhvKkIuhN7IRYiS4YTs17w8mY1b6OXSLKgjEWwrGh SrWfjdpfSfJfR4222Ynpo7XmhcbkLawwt5t277+lkpAl8ofYY+Xz/4tYLiIypwIGFzzv y02PoUcXl3T2ISD6+Lbpec9WE2L80IcKsz08ur7P72W0ilNo0cv+GH5J7hNkNwhC6Wq6 /Uww==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnxLGUrPCiw2dE27MhGBYi5ILxNUS70BPzayTKcdeDLlGrWsdBHczp9t7kdHineEivToy/mFGLESBUNvA==
X-Received: by 10.55.116.7 with SMTP id p7mr27400831qkc.1.1476030719948; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 09:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.26.152 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Oct 2016 09:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <03cbd1281c9646e594e47d934a565ebc@BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAKaEYhL9PisQkN3rutxUOQyD7BFcL4W+eV_wXmj6MFePwTYbPg@mail.gmail.com> <CAN40gStjfD8jgO1+gFbCLT9XAPOYKnDES68c4DbRph6AvdSDpQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKaEYhLGu3+-DcO6UrMGsPJSxpruWsc=fsM9O+qTjG7Rhrq1Sw@mail.gmail.com> <03cbd1281c9646e594e47d934a565ebc@BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2016 18:31:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKaEYh+pMQe-wc202p0ixor_AmPaqaEtZRpCR3wrpbsB_eFqLA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1148733abd7c04053e712e62"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/bkFZOrRwAODFiUkSv43WGhwsKEc>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 08:33:57 -0700
Cc: Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [art] [apps-discuss] IRC URIs to denote users
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2016 16:32:03 -0000

On 26 September 2014 at 20:49, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> wrote:

> Those registrations were part of the “URI Bulk Third-Party Registration
> Experiment”.
>
> For more info on that experiment, see the slides from IETF 85:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/slides/slides-85-iri-8.pdf
>

I just noticed ircv3

http://ircv3.net/

Perhaps worth continuing this discussion there?


>
>
> -Dave
>
>
>
> *From:* apps-discuss [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Melvin Carvalho
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 2014 4:55 AM
> *To:* Ira McDonald; Benjamin Young
> *Cc:* Apps Discuss
> *Subject:* Re: [apps-discuss] IRC URIs to denote users
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 23 September 2014 01:45, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Melvin,
>
> The current IANA URI Schemes registry includes the following
> three schemes:
>
>
>
> irc
>
> prov/irc <http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/irc>
>
> irc
>
> [Dave_Thaler
> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/uri-schemes.xhtml#Dave_Thaler>
> ]
>
> irc6
>
> prov/irc6 <http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/irc6>
>
> irc6
>
> [Dave_Thaler
> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/uri-schemes.xhtml#Dave_Thaler>
> ]
>
> ircs
>
> prov/ircs <http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/ircs>
>
> ircs
>
> [Dave_Thaler
> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/uri-schemes.xhtml#Dave_Thaler>
> ]
>
>
>
> All three of those are September 2012 provisional registrations
>
> (with references that include butcher and draft-mirashi-url-irc-01).
>
>
>
> Thanks for the info!
>
> Both the referenced specs seem quite old.  I think there was a time when
> Dave Thaler just put a ton of URI specs in the provisional queue, without
> necessarily major updates.
>
> It's still not 100% clear what the best pattern is, if any.
>
> Unless there's an objection may I propose:
>
> irc://user@host/
>
> This is very much in line with the work of Ben Young (cc'd)
>
> http://userinfo.me/
>
> Who proposes a neat way to get user profile info via HTTP as:
>
> http://user@host/
>
> I believe the intention of this is to write an RFC, so I'd like to align
> future work with that if possible
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> - Ira
>
>
> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
> Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
> Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
> Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
> IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
> Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
> http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
> http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
> mailto: blueroofmusic@gmail.com
> Winter  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176  734-944-0094
> Summer  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839  906-494-2434
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I was wondering if IRC URIs are standardized at all?
>
> The latest I found was :
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-butcher-irc-url-04
>
> I have a use case of marking reputation from one system (web chat room) to
> an IRC chat room, but I require an identifier for the user.
>
> The suggestions so far have been:
>
> irc://user@host
>
> irc://user@host/ -- trailing slash
>
> irc:user@host -- similar to xmpp
>
> irc://host/#user -- fragment could be problematic as per RFC 9386
>
> I've gone with the second option for the moment
>
> Any pointers would be most welcome.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>
>
>
>
>