Re: [art] More of whois email
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 01 August 2018 14:20 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C45612D7EA for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 07:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1D5CrARGU1oY for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 07:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F61F130DF2 for <art@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 07:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 18707 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2018 14:20:32 -0000
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 01 Aug 2018 14:20:32 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 14B9520031F1D0; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 10:20:31 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 10:20:31 -0400
Message-Id: <20180801142032.14B9520031F1D0@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: art@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20180801133346.EB8E9130E8D@ietfa.amsl.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/d7b4XttQs62WJIGQ7XpUoSicqME>
Subject: Re: [art] More of whois email
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 14:20:39 -0000
In article <20180801133346.EB8E9130E8D@ietfa.amsl.com> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- >Are you sure you are who you think you are? Now, now. As I hardly need tell you, we have decades of experience with approaches to establishing e-mail identity, from PEM and PGP to S/MIME and DKIM, and also decades of experience on dealing with spam and fraudument e-mail, most recently DMARC and ARC. I'm not likely to pay much attention to comments from anyone who hasn't made a reasonable effort to look at the past work and understand where it has succeeded and where it hasn't. A global address registry is a WKBI, a Well Known Bad Idea. R's, John
- [art] More of whois email pradeep
- Re: [art] More of whois email John Levine
- Re: [art] More of whois email claudio.allocchio
- Re: [art] More of whois email Delfi Ramirez
- Re: [art] More of whois email Eric Burger