Re: [art] whois email

[[e-mail]]

Quoting Ned Freed <[e-mail]>:

>> On 26.07.2018 17:18, Ned Freed wrote:
>
>>> And all this was back when privacy concerns were, if anything, an
>>> afterthought.
>>> These days the potential liability created by new laws make this idea
>>> completely impractical.
>>>
>>> tl;dr: This is a nonstarter.
>
>> Especially considering that after GDPR went into effect lots of
>> registries (e.g., in the US) went over to mask whois data; it would also
>> create additional spam problems with data harvesting.
>
>> How do you control SPAM then?. How do you say an email is authorised
>> or a spammer in a registry that can be queried by the email
>> software/protocols. Spammers can get emails from not only WWW but
>> ISP's and social media like facebook twitter also.whois of email can
>> have only one public field authorised or unauthorised.
>
> This is neither the time nor the place to provide you with a tutorial
> on the basics of spam control. Suffice it to say it's being done without
> the benefit of your proposal.
>
> 				Ned
No, i give you a simple solution to SPAM control. To have an whois email
standard and a field that can be queried authorised/unauthorised in the email
software. You talk like only engineers, not email users.
I dont need your tutorial, i need a solution. My life is in danger because of
email spammers. I proposed a solution in the draft. I need to say in my email
only emails from authorised should be recieved. A spammer is a  
spammer, it cannot
be determined by the content of the email, but by his/her past actions/emails.
In addition i should be able to say i want to only hear from those who  
have a phone number and those who can disclose their phone numbers.A  
email registry standard is necessary.
Pradeep Kumar Xplorer