[art] Fwd: Please approve a mailing list or inform me how to Create a mailing list for discussing these projects
pradeep@explodingmoon.org Tue, 24 July 2018 06:01 UTC
Return-Path: <pradeep@explodingmoon.org>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F59130E5B for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 23:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.663
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.663 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=1.5, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.164, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=explodingmoon.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eoeaFtfYpbUl for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 23:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy3-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy3-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.30.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42537130E4F for <art@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 23:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw11.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.11]) by gproxy3.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC1F40C8E for <art@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 23:39:58 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box439.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.239]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id hq3CfZh0xd20Thq3Cfd0pZ; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 23:39:58 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=explodingmoon.org; s=default; h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Subject:To:From: Message-ID:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=TVsaXiQARcHak3eyoe3IS1cMf8UzHiZf7/B4DY8tXd8=; b=aHu5wq2CGBA3oGBoRNz1KubQhA hMkk9160x/78APGZ4JLCNjrofsZwBcnndkpy1r0fu5WPIwWiI6xs2NncdlXd0ErkXPis588QDbyfQ 3yM+36CrimHi4DH8QcVjaztCG8d28Zo7VBIj7ntfU5QJLCKnzvq7350ZIA3mfqXyCrCZpkylVK9Vt WVB2sx+NNCGgQALoZevNNoKJ6N/XSErj4HX9FdKiBWhMGZQ63naFMieDlPItUcFRGNlpC8IowNKli pBdvBNo4kQpxccyDJJYIv4s69ZVPF8LqBU+anjSHJ2U8CPAb+DrqkKo8uGFk/JdoorlzH27GDccuZ WznIAnMQ==;
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=44273 helo=box439.bluehost.com) by box439.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <pradeep@explodingmoon.org>) id 1fhq3B-002Qoa-7J; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 23:39:57 -0600
Received: from 112.133.229.115 ([112.133.229.115]) by box439.bluehost.com (Horde Framework) with HTTPS; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 23:39:56 -0600
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 23:39:56 -0600
Message-ID: <20180723233956.Horde.VwDA13cFKL-tX28ssXrKSlg@box439.bluehost.com>
From: pradeep@explodingmoon.org
To: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu, ietf@ietf.org, ietf-action@ietf.org, art@ietf.org
User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"; DelSp="Yes"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box439.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - explodingmoon.org
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-Source-L: Yes
X-Exim-ID: 1fhq3B-002Qoa-7J
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: (box439.bluehost.com) [127.0.0.1]:44273
X-Source-Auth: pradeep@explodingmoon.org
X-Email-Count: 36
X-Source-Cap: ZXhwbG9kaTQ7ZXhwbG9kaTQ7Ym94NDM5LmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Org: HG=bhcustomer;ORG=bluehost;
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/iSpbVPzCPzSb15e0KrdKRd_tpZg>
Subject: [art] Fwd: Please approve a mailing list or inform me how to Create a mailing list for discussing these projects
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 06:01:35 -0000
There are two mistakes in this email i send, i have no idea whether its my fast typing or error introduced by my ISP or service provider delivering my emails. I typed intelligence or artificial intelligence The spammers email who extorted 850 dollars from me in 2015 and that resulted me cashless and harmed by my relatives in palakkad for six months and resulting deactivation of my website and loss of my postings for years i typed efcc.nigeria.org@representative.com I have proposed an email whois draft to control spam and cybercrime using emails. A new version of I-D, draft-emailwhois-pradeepkumarxplorer-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Pradeep Kumar Xplorer and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-emailwhois-pradeepkumarxplorer Revision: 00 Title: Extensions to WHois service to allow query on email identities Document date: 2018-07-24 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 4 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-emailwhois-pradeepkumarxplorer-00.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-emailwhois-pradeepkumarxplorer/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-emailwhois-pradeepkumarxplorer-00 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-emailwhois-pradeepkumarxplorer Abstract: This document describes the need for a WHois email address service similar to the internet domainname WHois service. Theres a need for a registered email address as opposed to non-registered email address to fight internet SPAM, as well as encouraging email use for personal, commercial and legal and all kinds of purposes.An internet user can have multiple email identities. I need professional service from ISP and cannot dispute with them at the risk of losing my emails. Pradeep Kumar XPlorer ----- Forwarded message from pradeep@explodingmoon.org ----- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 07:12:50 -0600 From: pradeep@explodingmoon.org Subject: Re: Please approve a mailing list or inform me how to Create a mailing list for discussing these projects To: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu, ietf@ietf.org, ietf-action@ietf.org Quick reply Please see http://www.pradeepkumarxplorer.com/YogaSequence.txt. Its what i as a blogger typed in. I tried to Create an HTML and stopped because of some mistakes half way through as it was tiring and time consuming to search and markup. Even using browser extensions, Creating an HTML out of this manually can take enough time to be discouraged. I am saying i want what can be computationally done at the server side done at the server side. If intelligent software has already been Created as browser extension, then it has to be available reused in the server side. Quoting valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu: > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 07:13:42 -0600, pradeep@explodingmoon.org said: > >> What i proposed is when user types httpi://www.pradeepkumarxplorer.com >> the information served by pradeepkumarxplorer.com httpd tunnels >> through another >> httpi that could be any solution server side scripting that shows the >> viewer of the information with additional links suggested by the WWW >> Brain. > > 1) No definition of "WWW Brain". I dont accept your answer. WWW and software has evolved with Artificial intelligence big companies like google use Artificial intelligence. I would say i dont have to define it for engineers. Its Intelligence of Artificial intelligence i am meaning. You have to answer me as a WWW user and not just an engineer. > 2) If anything, the Web is already *full* of "You may also like..." links > added by the server side. Quite obviously: > 2a) they don't need an httpi:// to insert them > 2b) they aren't very expensive to insert > 2c) There's browser extensions to *remove* these > 3) Therefor, the proper place for adding "additional links" is > obviously at the > user browser end - and there's extensions that will do this sort of thing > without need of an 'httpi://' protocol definition This is like saying to buy whats needed for my home, i have to enter five markets instead of one supermarket. WHo enforces that one Supermarket has soy milk, orange juice, cornflakes, cheese and eggs. If i have to visit more than one more market to satisfy my shopping needs, then its inefficient. I as a WIndows Personal computer android user have supported the companies that manufacture and market them so i have a right to demand that they ship efficient solutions and httpi is more efficient than browser extensions.Does IETF enforce any such, then they have to enforce this implementation and all httpd services tunnel through httpi. > > If these additional hyperlinks are something that's to be under user control, > it's a matter for the browser creators to add a configuration options or > way for an extension to interact and do the searching. And that will > be different > for Chrome, or Firefox, or Edge, or a MacOS or iOS browser and thus > not an IETF issue. The User can always search more, if intelligent profiling can show me what i want in the first place, then its a better user experience. > > For a worked example: > > https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/highlight-to-search/floipahigmmkfhkoapmnijnlnboniglg?hl=en > > Highlight the text on the page, and it will go a Google search for > more info. No httpi:// needed. > > You'll have to explain what problem you're trying to solve that isn't > already solved. In addition, you need to explain why a new on-the-network > protocol (which is what the IETF does) is needed, when it's already been > demonstrated to be doable without any new protocols or anything else > that is done by the IETF. Again, its the same market / supermarket analogy. If i have to enter five different markets to purchase my eggs, cheese, coffee, soy milk and chocolate then it solves the problem but in a dump and inefficient way. > >> This saves thousands of hours and possibly millions of dollars for >> website Creators from manually hypertexting their files using whatever >> tools like Hypothesiser or many browser extensions available. > > Not really. A site that insists on adding their own links will still > add their > own links, no matter what the user signals. Remember - if your "www brain" > extension is able to find keywords in the page and add additional links, > the web server can *also* do the same thing without an httpi:// - and so > can the user's browser (and probably better, because the user's browser > can query a site like Google that can make better suggestions because it > knows what previous queries the user has done...) Yes, but this is for websites that dont add their links. This is consolidation of intelligent searches in one place httpid or httpd tunneling through httpi. > >> WHat i proposed in my second draft is a switch on the server side that >> prevents an unauthenticated user from seeing any information and >> authentication means > > First off, if it's a switch on the server side, it's a server > configuration issue, > not an IETF issue. The way to specify that switch, and how it works, will > be different for Apache, or ngnix, or IIS, or Squid, or anything else that > is functioning as a web server or proxy. No its not configuration issue. I want it enforced that WWW servers are mandated to have the option of allowing only authenticated users to be served information. I am saying Solaris should not be allowed to ship if it does not have that Option.I am a website publisher for last 14 years and till todate i dont know who views my website and they are exploiting me and have harmed me and trying to kill me to exploit the WWW subscriber help. This is insider fraud by companies like facebook. I have Created something unique and definitely usable by millions. If you look at my facebook page http://www.facebook.com/lugimwidnaus only one likes it but i have had thousands of viewers http://www.pradeepkumarxplorer.com/2016/regions.txt. Its a misreprsentation by organised crime. ANd i have had no solution from cyberauthorities who might have tools to find out who is accessing my website as they are partner to it for money. I dont need that headache if i can enforce it using my WWW server. I used shared hosting and its something my ISP has to provide in control panel. This enforcement is to fight cybercrime.And that IETF should take a serious role in. If not which organisation can i propose projects to. Why is facebook and google 500 Billion dollar companies and me not being able to get even a single email from a viewer or subscriber help and have no income and has to depend on a mother at the age of 48. I am Ubermens and an Ex SUN employee. This is serious crime that has destroyed my life.I am saying facebook and google cannot do whatever they want. My Ex company seeded Google. I have no income from them nor Options enough to publish and not care about subscriber help given to me while i was employed in SUN. Someone is claiming i am wealthy and continuing the theft and now they want to get away with it and they would influence IETF not to approve my draft. They have attacked me using my mother and her relatives in palakkad who are not my society as an adult. I should be in New age california with yogins and softwares.Instead i am stuck in palakkad ,only information about me is in my own website and i cannot hold accountable who has enjoyed my website guidance and journals.The viewers are not putting links in their website about my website. I am operating publsihing my website as an individual and a clever harmful community is claiming it as their creation and exploiting me.IETF did not accept my whois email proposal either. IETF is a place where engineers from many companies work together to comeup with usable safe efficient internet. They have not delivered a SafE internet. > > And the user *SHOULD NOT* (in the RFC sense) be specifying information > to override the server's decision. > > Again - there's absolutely nothing stopping the server from doing > whatever sort > of authentication it wants to, and there's no need for IETF action. IETF has to enforce either only authenticated users access WWW or allow a choice of both anonymous and authenticated. I have no problems with private surfing but it should be the choice of the publisher and not the browser. > Webservers > can already do sufficient authentication - and a case can be made > that it's not > the IETF's job to specify that authentication. > > The short summary - you're not going to get an IETF list to discuss either > draft until such time as you show that it's something that is an > IETF issue to > deal with. And given that both drafts address things that have already been > done without any IETF action, it's unlikely you'll be able to show that the > IETF needs to do anything. I am saying IETF should enforce companies to role out products that prevent cybercrime. efcc.nigeria.org@representative among three more emails have spammed me and extorted money from me and had me almost killed me and destroyed my website. They are funded by the anonymous criminals viewing my website and has taken the money from viewers who can pay or from companies that i have been involved in the past. I would say a WHOIS email registry implemented and EMail services only forwarding emails from authenticated users would have prevented me recieving such SPAMs. I dont get SPAMMED in pradeep@dhyanayoga.info or pradeepkumarxplorer@pradeepkumarxplorer.com, if they are not SPAM the clever thieves has made me work 14 years and extorted few billions dollars of cash and now they want me to die in India.An email registry and modifications to email software can definitely prevent SPAM and that i think an organisation like IETF should enforce. > >> but someone from ietf.org has deleted my email pradeep@explodingmoon.org and >> i had to use my other email pradeepan88@hotmail.com. There's no way >> to say in >> internet that pradeep@explodingmoon.org and pradeepan88@hotmail.com are the >> same individual thats me > > 1) The deletion may be a hint that somebody at the IETF doesn't want > to hear from > you because your mails aren't related to the IETF. > > Pradeep Kumar Xplorer ----- End forwarded message -----
- [art] Fwd: Please approve a mailing list or infor… pradeep
- Re: [art] Please approve a mailing list or inform… pradeep
- [art] Fwd: Please approve a mailing list or infor… pradeep
- [art] Fwd: Please approve a mailing list or infor… pradeep
- [art] Fwd: Please approve a mailing list or infor… pradeep
- [art] Fwd: Please approve a mailing list or infor… pradeep
- Re: [art] Please approve a mailing list or inform… pradeep
- Re: [art] Please approve a mailing list or inform… pradeep
- Re: [art] Please approve a mailing list or inform… pradeep
- Re: [art] Please approve a mailing list or inform… pradeep