[art] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7505 (7172)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 20 October 2022 07:13 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF212C1524D6 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.959
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.959 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D6O3HAzoL_xG for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2B6FC152560 for <art@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 79A2B8FC82; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: standards@taugh.com, mx0dot@yahoo.com, superuser@gmail.com, francesca.palombini@ericsson.com, superuser@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: zackkidal8@gmail.com, art@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20221020071338.79A2B8FC82@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:13:38 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/opzpMKN5T3tI1uXmPk_yzxac5tY>
Subject: [art] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7505 (7172)
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 07:13:42 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7505, "A "Null MX" No Service Resource Record for Domains That Accept No Mail". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7172 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Azahar bin brahim <zackkidal8@gmail.com> 42899606 Original Text ------------- App data Corrected Text -------------- App data Notes ----- Back my account Google play Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7505 (draft-ietf-appsawg-nullmx-10) -------------------------------------- Title : A "Null MX" No Service Resource Record for Domains That Accept No Mail Publication Date : June 2015 Author(s) : J. Levine, M. Delany Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : ART Area General Application Working Group Area : Applications and Real-Time Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [art] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7505 (7172) RFC Errata System
- Re: [art] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7505 (71… Chris Smiley