Re: [art] ABNF vs. ABNF vs. BNF
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 29 March 2021 14:22 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFD43A1613 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 07:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uvd5B7snxZSd for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 07:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 533DB3A160B for <art@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 07:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1617027724; bh=wDMk+FezBT9471hBiimd4ZuZ3HLzWDShDXov5E81xiY=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=FfOfCUg2WDrLNJDL4S6V8697SdFqCqyozZqW7Pz+MkkO77yHzyI/gx4nAeoQ2Koz9 U7AUv2612MELF1tk+2sY8iPaPP9lEZbwS8pL55tPPuNfAcG0ocujJosn6Hy2WqayrM eUwV1XtDt1Y8xAFw5WAUAVPh4fQoJ6+8EiMwcugc=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([84.171.159.180]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MJmKh-1lB9LJ1rUv-00KAOZ for <art@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 16:22:04 +0200
To: art@ietf.org
References: <d59bd38e-3cad-ca76-bb7c-dab4bb8ef5fb@dcrocker.net>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <16dcf3a7-0148-cb63-c44e-cd7b67b6c584@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 16:22:04 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d59bd38e-3cad-ca76-bb7c-dab4bb8ef5fb@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Cq2rZIduN6YxeurHgbWeQn/FbBfts75RG81bAPyNCbKAr2Hm4aq 5rlcg6fkM14PqkpABAzMuSdsyl5K1T06/sTQgNoGrafqflY1NeK1q2+wWYvNCBpPvvZi6Kk QngYuctuWN+wd6YkfZ1TtuSkkQp5t760jRh80tGp+yySR84RpORKmcQmoHHGrsOGILsVJkP ItE0mvrQVvqdboOnCCAGg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:AAPrx0KZN1w=:cpZTyh/0qcIANar7FcDT4t 5a9EjQqeCo2DWpFja2rmeyMqJm9H4BIRDPeCFSBtWhHj0oaQ6aFksg8l70uUEbAkJnmipGRPz 4Mg6IcCPxK4tPemJ/8nGamb8WTGSJ1BTc033tS4gtlovHa7abf8x+wAVzO0h9iFyAzs1Gwqro aXku5BeJXra6gqB48EQfrdbqyMmwP6j9SFflbGq1/PG+DALsEhzJfQEy6PeStOvJtsqYanTOD U5ulBke6lMSqmsVznDN7BtfhFkyRLOgwEFx7T6Z12kORxzfS+/aWAaHDRWy5zyAcAZOocSQ73 5XSeHl8JKbbysnoyhoYhsOFmQOK2Oynl2YHXN3w7pSKAKJfJIHD0OS9DkFVLtC8RS1xArF9X6 A9bwgiRP8eIVBhQjt/Phy9VJdX/vmcvfoRQLE90eNxXgDFBFc/6TU/uSm1qoz3aViEEk/Oq1S H71xT+LD3EnvuSeQLVLP6wUO29c7PNMXK+E/5kuaxpdE1OT4WQC1ZkFrO9qoJRSwZYz+1BbTR Z8SYEYl2usML+3/2y/UGI8UgVa27rrijQBkm/XC82Hved58dS0ZixX7mCZE/ryB7ati9vd+c6 dmPA7m+3uzayuua8RkZnuzaZC8fuAWszrfHa3fzIm4VFuEstlfaX6xFwJTZmlvG9x6ntx4K7+ SSo1rTi+Iu1ElIHDaYtRFg1xzX33fBT5m9RKqgHA8PbkXaQQ+SFHTlkQxucS78CfTO0uB8sCq +5AJKxhAZ+bnQOVux07fcH4NAyRYbLeKhz8SicQPb/mAVc+KhSqyM/Mxc9YDp08lJuSfuxVSF UWzrwRh+XH60aPDLhKxe3pFpQSavMRmqWIGjocXqAOCbiZuxR0qpAMR6DxEaro3N2la5ZSlvK jvomy76rDBY45x9fAS9DTXxfCLvUPiLyMn2/saqlqJZzyAzEWcyp0sVDmmkT5ADzscaK0a07F ms+0ufEDx5P2dcvU+rjIN9g9ycUdA3ZEFQfhnghO1TI14YbiuBD3XQ+LX46zRLiKSSSs3uF25 28JDecdutMc7hbTx0J43Hs9vuOiSQAPGpE7FUknSKrR92CcC5LOA3t/trH1c+Vfude7oop/cz KBhaYCb7de29nC/MTvnqUdi7cxFpQZxoskcnL0lLInY2mj7g0LgqXWv/nQbjWO3JZcbhYfecl KtKF82nIHRMm0LhVe28/G+VJyBoyg/oIhPWE2eIfLoCfs5PjLzcYSj5Hbf8m/HVSO+/EJ5c1I k7I+wo1U6j7M6wLuQ
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/vCl1FCAVJfFlG7yqAH0_ch7QLS4>
Subject: Re: [art] ABNF vs. ABNF vs. BNF
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 14:22:12 -0000
Am 29.03.2021 um 15:29 schrieb Dave Crocker: > ... > I hadn't known about RFC5511, written by an old dog, for routing. I > vaguely recall there are others. This suggests that it might be good > for the text here to acknowledge a larger world of BNF-derivatives? > > d/ HTTP uses ABNF-5234 plus an extension construct for lists, see <https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7230.html#abnf.extension> (but ship a standard variant in an appendix as well). BEst regards, Julian
- [art] ABNF vs. ABNF vs. BNF Dave Crocker
- Re: [art] ABNF vs. ABNF vs. BNF Julian Reschke