Re: [Asap] draft-engi-siptrunkingcapability-link

"A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com> Thu, 15 September 2022 22:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mahoney@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: asap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3ACC15A727; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 15:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.29
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.398, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k4AJddJZ9NaX; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 15:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7372C1524AE; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 15:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.252] ([47.186.48.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 28FMgQjr088087 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 15 Sep 2022 17:42:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mahoney@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1663281748; bh=SI50S1q59TTsnkgtvfwEVMqXKQ+JM+Sl2xnbLsZC4a4=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=ksPTfK8KWiCdW0a6GPsGkN6FMILIEdWu7z7tWymuktrxIIDFbGxLf8dxWnLIkJSnk WND/5WfLzAaiSKR1hgkFmXoS7BKze1mrPiUiPRNLNsbM990J7IRdBaqv86SKu/LWda rESmfXW/TAX2vC3FCSCQjdMdxU/1A3KfPQ8VWFLM=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.48.51] claimed to be [192.168.1.252]
Message-ID: <41067e57-46b9-1e58-7791-f4955f53e313@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 17:42:21 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2
Content-Language: en-US
To: "Derek Engi (deengi)" <deengi=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "asap@ietf.org" <asap@ietf.org>
References: <DS7PR11MB6038530AB2BC985A0223A985C4499@DS7PR11MB6038.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: "A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <DS7PR11MB6038530AB2BC985A0223A985C4499@DS7PR11MB6038.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/asap/E30GXfVlFAfU1Le8g-LOmX7hhtM>
Subject: Re: [Asap] draft-engi-siptrunkingcapability-link
X-BeenThere: asap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Automatic SIP trunking And Peering WG <asap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/asap>, <mailto:asap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/asap/>
List-Post: <mailto:asap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asap>, <mailto:asap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 22:42:32 -0000

Hi all,

Unless the chairs hear any objections within the next two weeks, the doc 
will be adopted as a working group draft.

Thanks!
Jean


On 9/15/22 11:39 AM, Derek Engi (deengi) wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> 
> Thanks again for the feedback on this document, up until now the edits 
> we have made have been fairly minor. We have published a new draft, 
> available here:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-engi-siptrunkingcapability-link
> 
> I've summarized the document changes based on the feedback we have received:
> 
> Version 02
> 
> - Grammar change in section 3
> 
> - Moved justification logic from section 4 to section 3
> 
> - Added language relative to customer provided attributes and the 
> location definition of endpoint to be queried
> 
> - Added a reference to "acct" URI as the resource for the WebFinger request
> 
> - Encoding of GET request in WebFinger example
> 
> - Aligned the subject of the WebFinger response to the request resource
> 
> - Added an informative reference for RFC3986
> 
> - Updated acknowledgements for reviewers
> 
> Version 01
> 
> - Replaced RFC2119 with BCP14
> 
> - Removed extraneous comma from JSON example
> 
> - Added reference to OAuth 2.0
> 
> - Updated language with respect to IANA registration
> 
> - Updated acknowledgements for reviewers
> 
> Thanks again for the comments and suggestions on this document, looking 
> forward to the next steps!
> 
> @Jean, after the rounds of edit, unless the working group has any 
> issues, we think this draft is ready.
> 
> --
> 
> Derek Engi
> 
> deengi@cisco.com
> 
>