[Asap] Re: Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer-36: (with COMMENT)
Sreekanth Narayanan <sknth.n@protonmail.com> Sun, 21 December 2025 10:55 UTC
Return-Path: <sknth.n@protonmail.com>
X-Original-To: asap@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: asap@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D499D818AE for <asap@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Dec 2025 02:55:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rVJwN81ousQV for <asap@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Dec 2025 02:55:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-43103.protonmail.ch (mail-43103.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.103]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80D479D81897 for <asap@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Dec 2025 02:55:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1766314512; x=1766573712; bh=e8dKxk9ywZnrBDbAzRg47Qscq3xdMe5Tk1+krAvc3j0=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=ozD23Y4fXR3c5cuhxuB1QldzbJMg+i1ExMqY6w7ZGjY7R9S0gQ2MdwINElo53ihVP XZbLxOOnXY0t4ozRP5w4GzN4BojG07Ge61xvg/oHROQ2EgZP+g0zbNkvz79bZ1Pq6t j6togM/gETwaE6tUviT0D1X7wTfbRODRSqyoC/gus1hA3fPrZPZD445PJBWRs4dl2n kkvYe/s5z3lrtybblLKJe6JPG0Gy9HzhWkQzRlZoSEX2Wrdi29gZY+X/QJ+Qw2SI1A HLUMkJPQAMRH0RDrABvegza2ik5uJh32xzWfBITf0tPV8O7940XZ1Oc+V0YKQ2Cz/a i4Nzpm6uHmG2Q==
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 10:55:07 +0000
To: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>
From: Sreekanth Narayanan <sknth.n@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <yJVrMBz9jNprf-etqwMRpbQdQkwFvTR_0AUt_GPXjo9vWvqWN85JlcqfEWot9lL7_fVWr0DdC19AC1pTPFYD0jJ_fHFzcYapYIjXCzxXiSA=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <176576704990.394361.10820501280413540996@dt-datatracker-5bd94c585b-pvtsm>
References: <176576704990.394361.10820501280413540996@dt-datatracker-5bd94c585b-pvtsm>
Feedback-ID: 5262089:user:proton
X-Pm-Message-ID: 654684183d40e34bc1c45c14fa08b86317e4ee95
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: PKI5LZHULB5JKK4VIKO6A7F54GZ4XMRU
X-Message-ID-Hash: PKI5LZHULB5JKK4VIKO6A7F54GZ4XMRU
X-MailFrom: sknth.n@protonmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, asap-chairs@ietf.org, asap@ietf.org, draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer@ietf.org, marc@petit-huguenin.org, snandaku@cisco.com
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Asap] Re: Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer-36: (with COMMENT)
List-Id: "Discussion list for the Automatic SIP trunking And Peering (ASAP) Working Group" <asap.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/asap/s9o08NXxEr4ULzq6kD67fEzXRr0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/asap>
List-Help: <mailto:asap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:asap-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asap@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:asap-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:asap-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Mike, I've updated the latest version with changes suggested below. https://author-tools.ietf.org/diff?doc_1=draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer-36&doc_2=draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer-37 Thanks Sreekanth On Monday, December 15th, 2025 at 8:20 AM, Mike Bishop via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer-36: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-asap-sip-auto-peer/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for addressing my previous DISCUSS and COMMENTs. A few notes left from > the diff, but nothing blocking, so I'm updating my ballot. > > In the third paragraph of 4.6, "in such statuses" => "in such responses". HTTP > > responses contain a status code, (header and potentially trailer) fields, and a > body. > > Throughout, change most occurrences of "HTTPS" to "HTTP" except when talking > specifically about the "https" URI scheme (which should be lower-cased). > Compare to https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#https.uri for usage. I > see that you've made changes in this direction, but now lower-case some > instances where you're talking about the protocol rather than the scheme. The > RFC Editor can probably help sort this if needed. > > TLS is required, but no particular version? Why not 1.2 or later, or 1.3? > > Consider using the line-wrapping format described in RFC8792. > > > > -- > Asap mailing list -- asap@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to asap-leave@ietf.org
- [Asap] Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ietf-a… Mike Bishop via Datatracker
- [Asap] Re: Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ie… Sreekanth Narayanan